And we wonder why there were two defectors from the New York Senate Democrats. Apparently the Pledge of Allegiance is partisan, too. Good grief.
Hat Tip: Melissa Clouthier.
And we wonder why there were two defectors from the New York Senate Democrats. Apparently the Pledge of Allegiance is partisan, too. Good grief.
Hat Tip: Melissa Clouthier.
So the long awaited launch of my newly designed website is TONIGHT! This means, however, that it may be up and down a little throughout the course of the night. Be patient! I am aware of it, and I CAN’T WAIT . Sorry for the inconvenience, and any issues should be taken care of by morning. The guys at Toga Entertainment have done an AMAZING job and I’m thrilled to have them on my team! Be sure to check out their website.
Second, I will be chatting with Tammy Bruce tomorrow on the Laura Ingraham Show at 10:30am Eastern. We’ll be talking Smart Girl Politics, the Tea Parties, and addressing the general insanity that is our country right now. Be sure to tune in!
Third, I will be joining Tammy Bruce and Stephen Kruiser in Tucson, Arizona on Friday to speak at the Tucson Tea Party this Saturday for the Fourth of July. In case you don’t follow me on Twitter or Facebook and haven’t picked up on that already. Stay tuned for reports from the event!
It’s gonna be a whirlwind week! I’m stoked!
*This article was written by Rob at Leaning Right. This article does not necessarily reflect the beliefs of Tabitha Hale. Direct your hateful comments to me. *
In 1988 when George HW Bush was running for president he used that ever so famous line “Read My Lips: No New Taxes.” This line, written by the elegant Peggy Noonan, has become a buzzphrase connected to the word “Liar.” He raised taxes and lost re-election.
Remember September 12, 2008 when then-Senator Barack Obama spoke to a crowd in New Hampshire?
“I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes” (September 12, 2008, Dover, NH)
I will set aside all arguments on how raising taxes on anyone regardless of income is bogus. It is easier to point out that this statement was simply not true.
First, and probably with the support of many “social conservatives” (I hate that term but had to use it here), the first tax increase came in early April entering the President’s 4th month in office when he signed one of the largest tax increases on the working class in history.
Now in office, Obama, who stopped smoking but has admitted he slips now and then, signed a law raising the tobacco tax nearly 62 cents on a pack of cigarettes, to $1.01. Other tobacco products saw similarly steep increases.
I make under $250,000 a year. In fact, I make around 10% of that. I smoke. My taxes went up. And hold your tongue on that “you can choose to stop killing yourself” crap because that argument doesnt hold any water. You can quit buying gas and turn down that promotion that would put you in a new tax bracket. Taxing people for their personal habits and decisions is wrong. End of story.
NOW the most recent tax increase that is on everyone’s mind is what came about with this cap and trade fiasco, the president’s first major attempt at combatting the so-called climate crisis.
The Wall Street Journal reports:
The Congressional Budget Office… estimates that the price hikes from a 15% cut in emissions would cost the average household in the bottom-income quintile about 3.3% of its after-tax income every year. That’s about $680, not including the costs of reduced employment and output. The three middle quintiles would see their paychecks cut between $880 and $1,500, or 2.9% to 2.7% of income. The rich would pay 1.7%. Cap and trade is the ideal policy for every Beltway analyst who thinks the tax code is too progressive (all five of them).
How does Cap and Trade Work? Christian Science Monitor has a good explanation.
A governing body caps the amount of pollutants that can be released into the atmosphere, then mandates that companies emitting those pollutants must hold permits to cover the amount of pollutants they expel. To reduce pollution, the governing body slowly reduces the number of allowances available over time…
…when participants place a bid, they name the amount they’re willing to pay per allowance and the number of allowances they’d like to purchase……The bids are then collected and ordered according to price. Starting at the top of the list, with the highest bids, the auction overseer works his way down, adding the number of allowances requested until he reaches the total number of allowances offered in that auction. When he reaches that point, he draws a line; everyone above the line receives the number of allowances they requested at the lowest winning bid – the price closest to, but still above, the line. This is known as the clearing price, the price that every winning bidder will pay for their allowances, no matter what price they originally bid.
So the companies that offer to pay the most, pay the same amount as those that offer to pay the least, so long as the government believes that that least amount is acceptable. The companies that offer to pay less than what the government determines is acceptable get screwed out of the energy that they may need.
To use a word that people will accuse of being extreme, this is the definition of Fascism.
Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it.
‘But.. But.. Mister Rob… The taxes are against evil corporations that want the ocean to swallow up New York City and cast the world into an ice age. The working class is left alone.’
Unless of course you work for a corporation. Like Wal Mart, Microsoft, Google, GM, GE, and the rest. The government is cutting emissions by a whopping 15%, so naturally the price will increase to reflect the demand for the 85% of energy that is left. Those price increases will be reflected in the very same budget that reflects your wages. And I have a hard time believing that companies already just blow money on energy that they don’t need, but let’s say they cut every corner to bring their usage down to their minimal requirements with their current labor force. What’s the decrease? A whopping 1/6 of their energy budget? Try cutting your food budget by 15% and see if you don’t have to cut back on other things.
This will result in unemployment. Duh.
Oh, and where in the country will these taxes primarily come from?
Coal provides more than half of U.S. electricity, and 25 states get more than 50% of their electricity from conventional coal-fired generation. In Ohio, it totals 86%, according to the Energy Information Administration. Ratepayers in Indiana (94%), Missouri (85%), New Mexico (80%), Pennsylvania (56%), West Virginia (98%) and Wyoming (95%) are going to get soaked.
Those billionaires in New Mexico, West Virginia and Whyoming man. Those filthy rich bastards will be paying all these energy taxes. wait…
Who’s going to be benefitting without paying those taxes? Looks like the poor, hungry people in the states of Massachusetts, Connecticut, California, and New York. Wait…
I went to a wedding this weekend. I was gone for three days – and it felt like an eternity. After last week, I did Thursday’s Raisin’ Hale and left town. I made it three solid days without a laptop.
No, there were no convulsions.
What a weird week it was. It was emotionally taxing. It was terrifying. It was heartbreaking. The Iran coverage was enough to suck me in. I was glued to the computer Wednesday. I managed to talk about it for 7 minutes on the air before I had to change subjects because I couldn’t look at the photos attached to the articles I was referencing anymore. The same night, the Obamamercial for health care aired, and raised my blood pressure a few notches. I even live tweeted it for you, so you didn’t have to watch it. I’m sure you were as shocked by the content as I was. I learned SO MUCH! The VA and Medicare are apparently well oiled machines, old people should be given painkillers instead of proper care, 2/3 of the money needed to fund the $1-$2 TRILLION expansion in the next decade is already in the system, so it won’t cost us a thing (nevermind that pesky $10 trillion deficit) – and when all is said and done, Obamacare will be as effective as the Mayo Clinic! (Which is private. By the way.) My fears have officially been relieved. Thank you Obama!
The next day, the world stopped to watch the Michael Jackson circus, and on Friday the Cap and Tax bill slipped through the house without much fanfare. Naturally, House Democrats slipped in 300 pages in the wee hours of the morning, which no one read. Eight Republicans jumped ship, which is only MORE infuriating because had they voted like actual Republicans, the bill would have failed. Say goodbye to even more jobs. Thanks for that, Team Pelosi. I wish I could say I was disappointed, but that implies that there were some expectations to begin with.
I had 17 hours of alone time in the car this weekend to contemplate the week. Since I’m being vulnerable here anyway, I’ll go ahead and admit to you that I kicked off the weekend by crying when Billie Jean came on the radio. I was done. Cue emotional barf.
Why am I writing this? I don’t know. I spent the weekend with one of my best friends in the whole world, standing beside her as her maid of honor, and I cried for two days. As with most weddings, it was bittersweet. Now here I am, thrust back into reality, staring at a blank screen. So much is whirling through my head, there are so many things to cover that it’s mind boggling. I’m not even sure where to start. I’m tired. Emotionally spent.
I’m speaking in front of thousands in Tucson, Arizona on Saturday and am collecting my thoughts. Given just 15 minutes to address people about freedom, what do you say? There is so much. Despite the heaviness of the week, of this month, and of this year, I have to believe that there is an opportunity here. This is our window to remind people that they are free, and that they have to work to keep it that way. The Fourth of July could not have come at a more appropriate time.
End word vomit. Now back to our regularly scheduled blogging.
I don’t generally ask for money, but this one involves me. So here goes:
Can you spare a $10.00 dollar bill to help out some fellow conservatives and maybe win some really cool prizes?
I hope you can!!
RFC radio ( radio for conservatives) is holding a fundraiser to help keep it’s phenomenal programming on the air. Since it’s launch back in February RFC has expanded it’s programming from just all kick ass rock-n-roll to now hosting some of tomorrow’s future conservative pundits TODAY.
The station has made some huge strides, but now we need a little help. We are holding a fundraiser to raise $2,5000 by June 30th to help defray the costs of operating the station and paying for all the licenses ( U2 and Ted Nugent do get royalties when their music is played.) Were 25% of the way there and have ONE week to go to reach this goal. There are some great prizes you can win if you donate today also.
* To the largest donor you will win a Internet radio / network audio player with iPod dock / FM radio .
* To anyone that donates at least $ 10.00 dollars will be entered in a drawing to be interviewed on the RFC hit talk show ” Raisin Hale” hosted by the Tabitha Hale who also is author of the widely read Pink Elephant Pundit.
* There will be random drawing for donations of any amount for RFC swag including T-shirts, hats and stickers.
I hope you can donate to this cause. RFC is putting out some GREAT content right now and helping to shine a light on the shadiness of the current group in Washington and beyond. Please donate anything you can today!!!!!!
I’m covering this because the mainstream media won’t. Mike Adams and Thomas Lifson have already done the legwork.
From Mike Adams:
Frank Lombard is the associate director of Duke’s Center for Health Policy. The university administrator was recently arrested by the FBI and charged with offering up his adopted 5-year-old son for sex. I tried to contact Frank Lombard over the weekend to probe his expertise regarding the health benefits of raping small children. So far, he’s declined to comment.
University administrator Lombard is accused of logging on to a chat room online and describing himself as a “perv dad for fun.” The detective who wisely looked into the suspicious screen name says that Lombard admitted to molesting his own adopted son. All this was before allegedly inviting a stranger to travel to North Carolina from another state to statutorily rape his already-molested adopted son.
Lombard, a licensed clinical social worker with a master’s degree in social work, is a health-disparities researcher who studies HIV/AIDS in the rural South. This means that Lombard toiled in fields of the victimology industry, mining data for correlations that would underwrite government favoritism of victim groups.
On Monday, according to the affidavit, Det. Timothy Palchak of the Washington Metropolitan Police Department, chatted online with a person using the name “F.L.” Palchak said “F.L.” described specific sex acts he had performed on a 5-year-old child and said that he lived in Durham.
A search warrant filed for Lombard’s house further outlines the case against him, and includes a transcript of the chat between Palchak and “F.L.”
In the chat transcript, “F.L.” is asked how he got access to a child so young. “Adopted,” he replied, and said that the process was “not so hard … esp (sic) for a black boy.”
In the chat, “F.L.” told Palchak that abusing the child was “easier when he was too young to know what was happening and when he couldn’t talk …He had a little too much Benadryl. Was knocked out.”
Disgusting. However, Lombard is in custody. These stories nauseate me. We all have a gut reaction to stories about children being hurt. He is being appropriately charged. People do horrible things. It’s nothing new… so why am I reporting this? Because I’m sick of political correctness and agendas tainting the news. First of all, there is virtually no coverage of this beyond the AP article that was released Friday. The AP article conveniently omits the fact that the little boy was black, and the fact that the father was gay. Which means that, since ABC, Fox, et al only reported the AP release, no MSM reported these facts. CNN hasn’t bothered putting the story on their website at all. Why? We all remember the circus revolving around the last Duke rape case. Let me refresh you.
Crystal Gail Mangum was a black stripper/”escort” who falsely accused three white lacrosse players of rape. The media, as well as Duke University, jumped all over it in an attempt to paint it as a hate crime. The players were quickly villianized and kicked out of school. When they were declared innocent, the University begrudgingly readmitted them, and three years later there is coverage of the subsequent lawsuits. Two books were written about it.
Adams sheds some insight on why the University is keeping this story hush hush:
The Associate Press (AP) did not mention the fact that the five-year old offered up for molestation was black. Bringing that fact to light might be damaging to the political coalition that exists between blacks and gays. Nor did the AP mention that the adopted child is being raised by a homosexual couple. Bringing that fact to light might harm the gay adoption movement.
Am I saying that this is a result of the couple being gay? Absolutely not. No one is naive enough to think that these things don’t happen in “traditional” homes. What I have a problem with is stories like this being kept under wraps as a result of the particulars. It seems that there are classes of people the mainstream media deems necessary to protect. Gays, Muslims, and racial minorities are among them. Suffocating stories that contain inconvenient truths is a dangerous practice.
Also catch Tabitha on rfcradio.com ( Radio for Conservatives ) at 10:00 pm eastern every Tuesday and Thursday night.
Enter the chat room, listen to the show, and have a blast!
I almost hate to blog about this whiny Mark Sanford presser. It seems so inane when Iran is going up in flames and health care is about to be forced down our throats tonight. However, here I am. Giving more internet space to it. Maybe because I’m so frustrated with the people in charge of our country. Can we not find anyone who will keep it together and not screw themselves and the entire party over? I never cared much about Sanford either way, but now the GOP has even more damage control to do. The spectacle he’s made out of it is not helping anything. Mysterious South American trips? Disappearing acts?
Glad you did the right thing and came clean, now Boooooo! Get off the stage, so the press can get back to not covering the shambles of our economy or this story and not asking Barney Frank if he is learning disabled, not asking uncomfortable questions about healthcare, and the climate, or this lie or ohh…what’s the point. There is a sex scandal to report about, and sex trumps everything, especially when the story uncovers someone with an R after his name. As we all know, sex is “private” except when it is not, and the world is full of perpetual adolescents (on every side) who will immediately follow this (or the execrable “Jon & Kate Divorce” story) to the exclusion of anything else.
And Sanford goes down in flames. Buh-bye. I suppose this is better now than later. This would have sucked a lot harder close to election time.
CNN originally posted a 4 minute long clip of an eyewitness account of the situation in Iran. She speaks of the regime shooting at its people, beating them, throwing them off the pedestrian bridge, going into the crowd with axes. Yes, axes. “This is genocide. This is a massacre… this is Hitler!” she cries. “You should help us!” Naturally, CNN edited all of her please for help, and brought it down to a one minute clip.
Thanks to YouTube, here’s the full 4 minute segment. It will break your heart.
Are you so excited about ABC’s Obamacare commercial tonight? It kind of makes me want to gag thinking about it.
ABC’s breech of trust with the American people is equally as disturbing. You need not look much further than three curious facts:
- A former ABC staffer runs Obama’s health communications department.
- ABC employees gave $160,000 to then-candidate Obama during the campaign, with additional money going into the coffers of now-White House Chief of Staff Rham Emanuel and his PAC.
- ABC refuses to accept any paid spots during its health care presentation, “Prescription for America,” from outside interests with viewpoints alternative to the national health care platform the president and the Democrats in Congress are trying to muzzle us with.
ABC, naturally, defends its plan Wednesday to interview both Obamas on “Good Morning America” and have lethargic anchor Charles Gibson broadcast the weakly-rated “World News” from the White House and then air a prime-time, hour-long townhall special from the Blue Room, with the president fielding questions from Gibson, Diane Sawyer, a panel of guests, and audience members chosen by ABC:
ABC News prides itself on covering all sides of important issues and asking direct questions of all newsmakers — of all political persuasions — even when others have taken a more partisan approach and even in the face of criticism from extremes on both ends of the political spectrum. ABC News is looking for the most thoughtful and diverse voices on this issue.
All political persuasions… that are left of center. I really wish ABC would give up the pretense of objectivity in regards to the Obamamercial. They’ve been pretty clear that they don’t want any dissenting voices in the room. Heaven forbid someone speak out against socialized medicine. Blasphemy!