Category Archives: Equality

You can't legislate the poor into prosperity.

I stumbled across this quote this morning and wanted to share.

“You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation.. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.”

Since it was in the same arena as a conversation I had on Twitter yesterday about the responsibility of government to care for it’s people from a Biblical perspective, I have been thinking a lot about it. Since the majority of the hate mail I get is based in religion, I figure I need to hit on this from time to time.

His perspective was that Jesus would want society to work collectively for the good. Which is true. That was the original plan. However, we live in a fallen world. People are NOT perfect, and each person needs to be accountable for their own actions.

Should we help those who are in need? YES! I say that emphatically. But it is NOT the responsibility of the government to do so. It is the responsibility of the individual, of private charities and organizations. Despite the “tough economic times” we’re so often reminded of people DO give. They always will.

Now for the preachin’. Jesus was about personal accountability and responsibility. Let’s take a look at 2 Thessalonians 3:10.

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

And then we have Luke 12:48.

Everyone to whom much was given, of him much will be required, and from him to whom they entrusted much, they will demand the more.

Read: you are responsible for yourself and for what you have. If you don’t work, you don’t eat. If you are entrusted with a lot, then YOU are responsible for what goes along with that. There is nowhere in the New Testament where the mandate to care for one another gets passed off to the government. All that does is remove personal accountability and places it in the hands of our representatives and those who pay taxes.

You do not grow a responsible society by taking away the accountability of the individual.

If you view society through a collectivist lens, then you’re operating under the assumption that everyone has everyone elses’ best interests at heart, which is just not true.

I fail to see how removing consequences and incentives benefits anyone. Jesus was clear that not everyone should have the same thing. Equal opportunity is not the same as equal outcome. Some people are given more than others. Some earn more than others. We were not all designed to be the same person.

There are inequities in our society. There always will be. In America, we are to be given equal opportunity. After that, it’s between you and God.

The Ant and the Grasshopper

Got this via email. Made me laugh, so I’m posting it. Enjoy!

OLD VERSION:

The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.  The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.

The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.

MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!

MODERN VERSION:

The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.
The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving.

CBS, NBC , PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.   America is stunned by the sharp contrast.

How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so?

Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody cries when they sing, ‘It’s Not Easy Being Green.’

Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant ‘s house where the news stations film the group singing, ‘We shall overcome.’ Jesse then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper’s sake.

Nancy Pelosi & John Kerry exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer.

The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.

The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant’s old house, crumbles around him because he doesn’t maintain it.

The ant has disappeared in the snow.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.

MORAL OF THE STORY:  Be careful how you vote in 2010.

The Deep South, The Middle East… Same Thing!

And here goes HuffPo again. Johann Hari calls the Southern US one of the most homophobic places on the planet.

The joke isn’t on gay people; it’s on the bigots who, when confronted with this creation, believe he is real, and typical of gays. Baron Cohen literally risked his life to make the point. He went to some of the most homophobic places on earth — the refugee camps of the Middle East, and the Deep South of the US — and behaved as a gargoyle drawn from the subconscious fears of homophobes.

Wait, excuse me? Except for all those other places where it’s outlawed. For so long, Democrats have worked to destroy the Southern part of the country based on past offenses. Are things perfect here? No. Are there pockets of serious bigotry throughout Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Georgia and the Carolinas? Absolutely. But they are hardly the norm. In fact, Atlanta has one of the largest gay populations in the country, and their Pride Day festivities are covered nationwide.

The larger issue is that, like many non-southerners, Mari hates the south every bit as much as he claims the south hates gay people. He thinks that the GOP gained a stronghold in the south because the Democrats stopped caring about people.

So how did Nashville become a Republican heartland? Because the Democrats stopping speaking up for the poor and the lower-middle – the people Hank Williams sang “had lots of luck, and it’s all been bad.” Why? The party became slowly addicted to donations from the super-rich – so like the Republicans always had, they defended their donors, not their voters. There were two political parties with one economic policy. Nobody was left to talk about the economic screwing of the South. So what was left? Cultural differences. If you stopped talking about rich and poor, you started obsessing about flags and fags.

Wait, really? Democrats became too much like the evil Republicans, and since they agreed the only thing left to do was hate “fags”? How deluded and twisted. How about paying attention to the success of the south? The fact that it’s the fastest growing part of the country, with a low cost of living. Here in North Carolina we have 11 of the 100 fastest growing counties in the country. The fact that we’re the least affected by the recession… and this is BECAUSE of more conservative leadership. It’s easy to play by a 50 year old set of rules, but at some point you need to update. The south it not what it once was regarding homophobia or race. We’ve come a long way.

What this comes down to is that the left NEEDS to demonize the south. It’s necessary for them. They need a counterpoint to their own bigotry. It’s easy to bury your own faults when you spend all your time placing them on someone else. Think it doesn’t exist?

Okay fine. I just wanted a reason to use that video. But all you need to watch is the Sotomayor hearings to get a grip on the bigotry of the left. Racism, homophobia, and other bigotry are NOT exclusive to the south, or to the Right.

Short story: Stop blaming the south. We’re not homophobic Bible thumping zealots a la Westboro Baptist. We’re not KKK members, and the last time I checked we weren’t beheading gay people.

Justice Ginsburg: Abortion = Population Control

Abortion talk with Justice Ginsburg. This proved to be a sufficiently chilling conversation. From the NY Times:

Q: The case ties together themes of women’s equality and reproductive freedom. The court split those themes apart in Roe v. Wade. Do you see, as part of a future feminist legal wish list, repositioning Roe so that the right to abortion is rooted in the constitutional promise of sex equality?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Oh, yes. I think it will be.

First of all, huh? Being equipped to have children makes us less equal? Don’t think so. This drives me absolutely batty. The fact that we are designed to have children is not a handicap. It is not a burden. The idea that women need to have on demand access to abortions is part of a Constitutional promise is absurd. By that logic, the government should find ways to enable men to bear children. After all, are we living in a truly equal society if men cannot carry and birth children? Shouldn’t that fall under the “Constitutional promise of equality”?

The self-loathing in this thought process is evident. This is about finding ways to fight the very essence of who you are. As a woman, you are created with the anatomy that makes it possible for you to bear children. By reviling that possibility and claiming that they are not being treated as an equal citizen unless they have the right to rid yourself of it, they are actually claiming that women need assistance to be equal. Girls: You were made a certain way. I’m sorry you hate it.

Q: If you were a lawyer again, what would you want to accomplish as a future feminist legal agenda?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. There will never be a woman of means without choice anymore. That just seems to me so obvious. The states that had changed their abortion laws before Roe [to make abortion legal] are not going to change back. So we have a policy that affects only poor women, and it can never be otherwise, and I don’t know why this hasn’t been said more often.

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae — in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong.

Seriously? Abortion was legalized as a form of population control, to get rid of unwanted populations? I suppose that’s similar to Nancy Pelosi’s view on abortion. Fund Planned Parenthood! Less people will help the economy! Remember that? I’ll refresh you:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?

PELOSI: Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So no apologies for that?

PELOSI: No apologies. No. we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.

Right. So we should work really hard to get the government involved in making sure that everyone has the ability to terminate any life they find inconvenient. Because THAT is the key to our economic recovery.

The tone of these women regarding this topic is, well, creepy. We are not less equal because we can bear children. Abortion is NOT a form of birth control, and it should NOT be used to control population or weed out undesirables, as Ginsburg alluded to.

Yay! My President Is Lying To Me!

In the midst of all this played out Miss California gay marriage discussion, people seem to be completely ignoring the current administration’s stance. So let’s watch Obama discuss Gay Marriage.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6K9dS9wl7U&feature=player_embedded]

Why isn’t he being attacked? Because some proponents of gay marriage hope that he’s lying. They think that, deep down, he supports gay marriage, and is just playing the political game.

From Marx Marvelous:

By the way, some people squibble about Obama’s support of civil unions over gay marriage.  I agree that it’s awful that he supports separate but equal and won’t take a stand for our full rights with marriage.  But I think Obama actually supports gay marriage.   He is making the politicallty safe maneuver of supporting full rights with civil unions and banking on the fact that 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 years from now the Supreme Court will declare that you can’t have to separate but equal institutions.

Commenter on Fox LA:

Obama actually supports gay marriage, but by asking Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration, Obama’s trying to reach out to the religious right wing that didn’t vote for him.

And the leader of our country should be a liar because…? The idea that they are HOPING that their President is putting up a front is a pretty scary thought. Issue aside, if you’re an activist, wouldn’t it piss you off if someone you believed was on your side wouldn’t fight for you? I’m thinking about this in the context of issues that I’m passionate about – primarily fiscal hemorrhaging. If someone came into office and said that he thought stimulus spending was appropriate, I wouldn’t back him under the notion that he didn’t really want to spend the money, he just was waiting until it was a more popular idea. I’d be pissed, and I would try to vote him out.

But I suppose reason is a little too much to ask for when dealing with Lefties.

Why Are So Many Feminists Named Gloria?

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOSb1eY5Iik&feature=player_embedded]

Head to head. Well done, Laura. Gloria, I’m pretty sure that feminism, by definition, applies to women. It’s not an all encompassing equality terminology.

My favorite moment? “Perhaps she needs a heart transplant rather than the breast implants paid for by the pageant.” Classy.

I Can't Believe I'm Doing This…

I’m linking to HuffPo. You don’t have to click on it if you don’t want to.  But I want to talk a little bit about the Melissa Etheridge post. Yes, that was the HuffPo link. Click at your own risk. 

Sure, parts of the article are full of peac-y love-y “keep fightin’ the fight” stuff to the gay community. If you can look past that, here are some of the good points that I saw when I read that article:

I absolutely love how Warren responded to Melissa – he wasn’t judgmental, he wasn’t anything but open and receptive to what she had to say. He accepted her where she was, without buying into her agenda. He could have ignored her call, he could have done any number of things, but he didn’t. Instead, he stayed open to what she has to say. It’s amazing how people react when they’re treated like people instead of judged and condemned (I’m speaking about BOTH sides here). Warren has shown that Christians are not incapable of loving people they disagree with. It’s true, people. We’re not all bigots.

On the flip side, Etheridge has set a standard for the left. 

I received a call the day before to inform me of the keynote speaker that night… Pastor Rick Warren. I was stunned. My fight or flight instinct took over, should I cancel? Then a calm voice inside me said, “Are you really about peace or not?”

She set down her prejudices long enough to realize that if she stood for peace, she should probably be peaceful instead of inciting riots and protests. She reached out to Warren and an effective dialogue took place. Despite what most lefties want the world to believe, Warren didn’t threaten or attempt to belittle the gay community. He responded with kindness. Imagine that. 

Thanks for being a voice of relative reason on the left Melissa.

The Problem Is NOT With Rick Warren…

This Rick Warren debacle is ridiculous. The prayer at the inauguration is a piece of the ceremony that normally gets ignored. So what if an evangelical Christian is going to be the one speaking? Are we forgetting that Billy Graham did every inauguration from Nixon to Clinton?

The difference? Why is Warren being attacked? It’s easy – Obama made promises to the gay community that he cannot keep, and they’re trying to hold him to it.

Rick Warren has never said anything homophobic. He has never said anything derogatory. He has simply stated the Biblical view of homosexuality, and expressed a love for them as people. The issue here is not with Rick Warren at all – the issue is with the Bible’s stance on homosexuality.

From the AP:

“I was trying to point out I’m not opposed to gays having their partnership. I’m opposed to gays using the term marriage for their relationship.”

This happens to be my stance on the issue. I am not opposed to civil unions. God lets us make our own choices, and if someone makes a choice, they are entitled to the same benefits that I am as an American citizen. I also believe, however, that marriage is a religious ceremony, and as such should stand in accordance with what the Bible tells us marriage should be.

This is a prime example of what we discussed earlier this week. The demonization of Christianity is not a myth. It’s okay to be a “Christian” and celebrate Christmas and Easter, as long as you don’t dare speak out about what the Bible says. If you do, you’re hateful and intolerant. Let’s be honest – God makes it pretty clear what’s okay and what’s not. None of us are ever going to meet those expectations, but as Christians, our standard is set high. I will say this again – Warren has never been hateful at all. He has handled his stance the way a Christian should – he expressed his discomfort with gay unions being labeled “marriage”. He said nothing about stripping their rights. He did not judge them.

Looks like some of Obama’s appeal to the gay community is wearing off. He’s already retracted his pro-gay marriage stance. Now he’s asked an unapologetic Christian to pray. Oh, the horror! Just wait. My prediction is that Obama will alienate group after group throughout the next 4 years. This is just the beginning, ya’ll – the man hasn’t even been sworn in.

Democrats Need To Hate The South

The south has long been a stronghold for GOP candidates. I understand that there are stereotypes for every region, but none convey such strong images as the south – the racist, gun slinging, pick up truck driving, Bible quotin’, tobacco chewin’, cousin-kissin’bubba is standard fare in Hollywood.

Why does this stereotype carry over in to politics? Why does the left feel the need to perpetuate this idea of the south as racist, backwards rednecks? The answer is relatively simple – they need a counterpoint to their own racist ideologies. If they perpetuate the image of the south as irrelevant and racist, then their own hypocritical ideals are overshadowed. If our left wingers believe that the right is so full of racism, bigotry, and general intolerance, then they can rest a little easier.

Here goes. There has been much discussion of what Obama’s election meant for the US. Are we now a truly post-racial society? No. If we were, his race would not have been such an issue. There is no doubt in my mind that many people overlooked what he said based on their desire for a black president. And the media bought right into what Obama was selling.  Voting for someone BECAUSE they are black is a judgment based on skin color – is this not the very definition of racism?

I would also argue, on a more individual level, that funding and benefits given based on skin color are also racist. Why should someone from the same economic background as me receive more money based on the color of their skin? Yet it happens all the time. Minority education grants are standard fare in colleges. There is no equivalent grant for being white. Affirmative action is just a part of our culture. Companies have to fill their quotas of minority employees – how about letting them hire as they see fit? I don’t want people to hand me jobs because I’m a woman. This does nothing but compromise my credibility, as well as the strength of the company I work for. If I don’t deserve a position, they shouldn’t give it to me. Period. I could go on and on, but I am simply pointing out the inequity.

So what is the reality of the south? It contains half of the top 10 fastest growing cities in the country. Texas consistenty boasts the strongest state economy in the country. Where is all this growth coming from? Michigan. Western New York. Ohio. Pennsylvania. The dying economies of the north have driven people to their thriving southern counterparts for work. The cost of living remains below national average. Take a look at this graph:

col2_map_3q08

Notice something? Yeah, the bluer the state, the higher the cost of living (with exception of Alaska, which has extenuating circumstances, since it’s not attached to the US and all…) Housing is cheaper. Taxes are lower. In fact, Tennessee, Alaska, and Texas are among the only states left without a state income tax.

Yes, the south has it’s problems. There are factions that are backwards, but no more so than anywhere else in the country. The racism and bigotry of the 1800′s is a thing of the past. We’re not all homophobic religious fanatics. I don’t hang out at KKK meetings. On the whole, we are educated, industrialized, thriving cities, full of people who don’t want to leave and relocated northerners who got smart. I would never choose to live anywhere else.

Ya’ll come back now, ya hear? ;-)

Open Letter To Lefty Haters

Dear Lefty Hater,

I cannot wrap my brain around your definition of tolerance. In real life, tolerance means this:

tol·er·ance

Pronunciation:
?tä-l?-r?n(t)s, ?täl-r?n(t)s
Function:
noun

1: capacity to endure pain or hardship : endurance , fortitude , stamina

2 a: sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own b: the act of allowing something :toleration

3: the allowable deviation from a standard ; especially : the range of variation permitted in maintaining a specified dimension in machining a piece

This means allowing for deviation from YOUR standard, too. Quite honestly, though, I’m not entirely sure what your standards are. According to your non-discriminatory, politically correct rhetoric, anything goes. After all, we wouldn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Feelings are more important than logic and reason, right? We must do everything we can to avoid stepping on toes.

By my interpretation, your definition of “tolerance” extends to anyone who is not rich, white, Christian, or male. And Lord help you if you all in to all of the above. What happens when the oppressors become the oppressed? Who is there to defend those rights?

Rich people are targeted with higher taxes and demonized for their wealth. Do you not see the hypocrisy in the fact that 7/10 of the wealthiest senators are democrats? In the fact that Obama outspent McCain nearly 10-1? In the fact that among your most vocal supporters are Hollywood millionaires and billionaires, a la Oprah, Streisand, etc.?

I discussed yesterday how Christians are consistently demonized. I won’t rehash that, yet that still stands. It seems that your tolerance extends to non-Christians, gay people, minorities, and poor people. You act as a loud, obnoxious advocates, and generally pander to these groups until they completely submit – you own them, and you know it. After all, once a young, struggling, single mom has become dependent on WIC, how could she vote for someone who would take that away and risk her child’s welfare? After someone has been on welfare their whole life, how can we expect them to put someone in office who will remove their security blanket? The answer is simple – they won’t.

Start giving people the respect they deserve. Teach them that they are valuable, and then SHOW them you believe in them by setting the bar high. Stop providing easy ways out, and people will manage. People should be tested sometimes – how else will they know what they’re made of? Stop blaming rich, white men for your problems – many of you fall into the same category.Take responsibility. The world is not out to get you – you can choose not to hate.

Signed,

A broke but self-sufficient Christian white girl.