Category Archives: Uncategorized

Nashville

Well, the bus trip got cut short. Then I got busy again back in DC.

I did, however, get to visit one of my favorite cities as a result, so it was all in all a good thing. I spent Labor Day weekend in Nashvegas.

The Batman Building.

I spent five years there, and it remains one of my favorite places in the country. Then, if you have a weakness for music and good food, it’s totally the place to be. My best friend and I essentially ate our way through the city, visiting some of my favorite restaurants, like the Pancake Pantry, Mafiaoza’s, and Dotson’s, out in Franklin. Then, of course, there’s Lower Broadway.

Honky Tonks!

Continue reading

California, the Sierra Nevadas and Reno.

I think making Napa my first visit to California was a really good move. It was laid back and beautiful – and the weather was amazing. I’m aware that it is so different than San Francisco or Los Angeles, and I am pretty positive it was much more my speed.

We had a dinner with locals at the Napa County Fairgrounds last night – obviously, the wine was wonderful. A local Christian band named Remnant played as well – a very cool group with tight harmonies and a great acoustic vibe. It was a great evening and the Napa organizers were awesome.

This morning, we did the rally in Napa and then drove through the Sierra Nevadas. I couldn’t stop snapping pictures – between the sharp mountains and Lake Donner and the sparse town we’d  pass through, it was so unlike the rolling, green Appalachians I spent my whole life driving through. I sat in the front of the bus beside our bus driver Jerry and grabbed Instagrams through the window – bug guts and all. If we weren’t already an hour and a half late, I would have asked to stop. I would have loved to see Lake Tahoe!

Continue reading

Revamping and reassessing.

Here’s the deal.

I’ve let this site go, because of time constraints, yes, but also because I have other platforms for politics now. People actually read sites like RedState and the Bigs. This site has been dormant largely since I came to Washington.

I’ve decided, however, to relaunch it with a new purpose. I’m going on a three week cross country bus tour. I’ve been on the road a lot. I take a lot of pictures. I go a lot of places. I want to document it.

That’s what this will be from here on out. I will be blogging travel stuff, miscellaneous music and culture stuff. Life stuff. Political analysis will be elsewhere from here on out. Obviously there will be crossover because I live politics every day, but that’s not the purpose here.

Anyway. I’m excited to resurrect it. As I write this I am on an plane to California to kick off the Tea Party Express tour in Napa tomorrow. Check out the FreedomWorks site and Twitter for updates. I’ll do nightly photo dumps and such on this site. Hope you come along for the ride!

Governor Kasich on Obama: Why doesn't he do his job?

Ohio Governor John Kasich recently signed controversial Senate Bill 5, which restricted the much-abused collective bargaining power of public sector unions. The bill, similar to what passed in Wisconsin, inspired a similar level of vitriol from the unions and supporters.

Obama jumped into the conversation earlier this week saying “public employees should not be blamed for a financial crisis they had nothing to do with and sacrifices should be shared in tough economic times.”

Shared by who, President Obama? Because in Ohio, the average government worker makes 24.6 percent more than their private-sector counterparts. In addition, Ohio has lost more than 600,000 private sector jobs in the last 10 years, while public sector employees are still getting pay increases.

What SB5 does is remove automatic pay increases and introduce a merit-based system. At a time when Ohioans are struggling to find a job, those that are being paid with taxpayer money should at least be paid based on how well they’re doing their jobs. This is not a unique or unfair concept, and is in fact much more indicative of “shared sacrifice” than putting public sector employees into overpaid positions with bankrupt pensions while their private sector counterparts struggle.

When Kasich was asked about his thoughts on the President weighing in on what’s happening in Ohio, he didn’t mince words.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgOrPc_TWQQ[/youtube]

“We have balanced our budget, under this budget that we’ve presented, along with preserving the tax cut. The President of the United States has, I think a $3 trillion debt. Why doesn’t he do his job? When he does his job and gets our budget balanced and starts to prepare a future budget for our children, then maybe he can have an opinion on what’s going on in Ohio.”

Thanks, Governor Kasich.

Think Progress: The south deserved to be destroyed by tornados

The south is still realizing the full extent of the damage caused by this week’s stormsNearly 300 people are dead. The country is rallying in support of the devatated areas, and President Obama (who must have learned something from ignoring Nashville’s flood last year) is set break character to visit the very red state today.

Anyone with a soul feels pain for those affected. Thousands have lost everything. Lives were destroyed. Think Progress (via Da Tech Guy) has instead chosen to adopt the Pat Robertson model and claim Divine Justice for those redneck Republican climate change deniers in the south.

“Given that global warming is unequivocal,” climate scientist Kevin Trenberth cautioned the American Meteorological Society in January of this year, “the null hypothesis should be that all weather events are affected by global warming rather than the inane statements along the lines of ‘of course we cannot attribute any particular weather event to global warming.’”

The congressional delegations of these states — Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Georgia, Virginia, and Kentucky — overwhelmingly voted to reject the science that polluting the climate is dangerous. They are deliberately ignoring the warnings from scientists.

You’re reading that right. To paraphrase Brad Johnson’s post: Since the south has rejected the climate change hysteria, clearly they’re just asking for the wrath of Gaia, and should expect to be demolished.

If, unlike Johnson, you are interested in assisting those impacted by this disaster, you can help in the following ways:

  • Red Cross, or text REDCROSS to 90999 to donate $10 to relief efforts
  • Samaritan’s Purse
  • Text “Give” to 80888 to give $10 to Salvation Army relief efforts.
Our thoughts and prayers are with all of those in Alabama, Tennessee, Mississippi, Georgia, Missouri, and across the south.

Obama gets serious… by punting policy to celebs

President Obama enjoys presenting himself as a shining example of maturity, wisdom, and levelheaded leadership. Indeed, at yesterday’s birth certificate press conference, he told the pesky “carnival barkers” that it was time to “get serious.” Then, he boarded a plane to Chicago to film Oprah. To talk some more about getting serious, I imagine. He later put the birth certificate issue to rest once and for all by mentioning it at three fundraisers last night.

Today, he’s chosen to prove that he’s serious about reforming immigration by inviting renowned immigration policy experts Eva Longoria, Rosario Dawson and friends to the White House to talk about immigration reform. Yes, that Eva Longoria. Via The Hill:

The White House said Obama would meet with “influential Hispanics from across the country to discuss the importance of fixing the broken immigration system.” It said the discussion would focus on fostering “a constructive national conversation on this important issue as we work to build a bipartisan consensus in Congress.”

Besides Longoria, the star of “Desperate Housewives,” others invited to the gathering include actresses Rosario Dawson and America Ferrera, Univision hosts Don Francisco and Maria Elena Salinas and Telemundo anchors Vanessa Hauc and Jose Diaz-Balart. Continue reading

Union Thuggery Descends on FreedomWorks

Today, union thugs descended on the FreedomWorks office. It was the middle of the day, and there was some excitement outside as all the buses pulled up and people started to fill the courtyard. We decided to go out and show our support for freedom. Intern Steve was quickly suited up.

We wandered around talking to people, and saw the buses lined up on the street. NEA, AFT, SEIU, and CWA signs dominated – a veritable “who’s who” of union thuggery, to be sure. They all had on matching tee shirts and printed signs, as is to be expected.

I was taking pictures and video with my phone, and I heard my coworker getting into a heated exchange with one of the protesters. I turned on my iPhone camera and headed over to film it. They were going back and forth, the protester called my colleague a “little sh*t” just as I walked up, which is where the video starts. Then he noticed I was filming. Here’s what happened:

Basically, it’s ridiculous. I’m a 5’1 female in a dress, and he was standing up on a garden wall above me in the courtyard. He hardly felt threatened. I was stunned, because generally protesters are there to, you know, get their message out. They don’t normally shy away from the camera.

I’m very much okay, and very appreciative of the support from my fellow bloggers and activists today. I am, however, shaken up by the level of sheer hatred I experienced today. The look of fury on his face in the close up is appalling. I had not exchanged a word with him. He didn’t know who I was. He didn’t even know my name, what I do. He had probably surmised that I was with FreedomWorks and that was enough.

This just can’t be tolerated anymore. It’s one thing to be called a violent teabagger. It’s another to be called a violent teabagger while you’re being assaulted. They’ve been comparing themselves to the Egyptians ousting Mubarak. Looks like they’re not too far off, given that they share the tendency to assault women with cameras.

In addition, it’s disgusting to me that the first response I received from the Left was rationalization. “You were too close, respect personal space” and “well he obviously didn’t want to be filmed!” – essentially, it’s the “her skirt was too short” defense. No one deserves to be hit. The concern from a bystander was that “You’ll get on the news, stop it!” Unfortunately for him, he did not know who he was dealing with. I will ensure that this happens.

I was not asking for this. There was no confrontation between the thug and myself prior to this. He had not asked me to put the camera away. I was not as close as the video implies (it was cropped from a vertical iPhone video so it would fit on youtube). I was simply filming a protest, as I have done for the past two years. Amazingly enough, none of those crazy right wing extremists ever hit me.

At this point, I’m grateful we moved to a higher security building last month. For a bunch of violent racists, the Left sure seems to be comfortable threatening and attacking us.

We must really suck as bullies.

A Culture of Victimhood: Using Rape as a Weapon

This post was brought to my attention today by several women who were obviously incensed by Stacy McCain’s statements.

Here is the what I see as the heart of the initial post:

If you tumble into a random hook-up with no prior knowledge of the guy’s reputation and he turns out to be a selfish brute whose standard modus operandi is repulsive, dangerous or painful, in what sense are you a victim of anything except your own stupidity?

Rape is something that both sides are desperate to avoid and really quick to jump on when it seems as though it’ll work to their advantage. There is no delicate way to approach this, perhaps, but I believe it’s important to discuss.

I think we can all agree that no means no, and stop means stop. If at any point in preceding events a woman says no, all bets are off. No one is disputing that. There are, however, choices involved, and sometimes people make bad ones that they regret. If a woman decides after the fact that she made a bad choice, she doesn’t get to go back and decide that her partner was a “selfish brute”, to use Stacy’s words, and call it rape. At that point, the choice has been made.

A rampant culture of victimhood does nothing to empower women, and removing them of all responsibility in every situation is demeaning. Again, women are not responsible for rape in any instance, and the “she was asking for it” argument is generally noxious. However, using rape as a weapon against someone you’ve decided you want to destroy is inexcusable, and should be treated as such.

Assange is not someone that most of us would rush to defend, and there are certainly more facts that will be brought to light in coming days. I won’t pretend to know any more than I have read online about this situation. I certainly believe that when more than one woman comes forward and there are multiple accusations, things should be investigated. Speaking specifically to this situation, there seems to be little evidence that there was force involved.

Jill over at Feministe writes this:

There’s a lot going around in bloglandia and on the interwebs about WikiLeaks honcho Julian Assange’s sexual assault charge in Sweden; commentators are saying that Assange didn’t really rape anyone, and these are trumped-up charges of “sex by surprise,” which basically means that Assange didn’t wear a condom and so days later the women he slept with are claiming rape. . .
It also sounds like in one case, condom use was negotiated for and Assange agreed to wear a condom but didn’t, and the woman didn’t realize it until after they had sex; in the second case, it sounds like the condom broke and the woman told Assange to stop, which he did not. . . .

I don’t believe for a second that he managed to have sex with a woman without a condom without her knowledge. Let’s assume, however, that this actually occurred – isn’t the question more of an ethical one, on the level of not telling your partner you didn’t take your birth control? It’s still sex if he’s wearing a condom.

Regardless, I don’t think there’s much dispute that Assange is a scumbag. Being a scumbag, however, is very different from being a rapist. Should a stronger statement be made or more evidence surface, I’ll reevaluate the Assange situation. Until then, we should be careful not to let rape accusations with no basis be a trump card, and those who ask legitimate questions about public statements should not be labeled misogynists or rape apologists.

UPDATE: Stacy’s latest response is here.

Breaking the Stereotype: The Women of the Western Sahara

My trip to the Western Sahara this month was the first time I’d ever traveled to a Muslim country – and as a very Caucasian Christian American woman, there were reservations. Before you get excited, this will not be a commentary on Islam. I’ve no intention of drawing any conclusions about the religion – my goal is simply to illustrate what I saw on the ground in the Western Sahara. The Western Sahara, for the majority of you who have no idea where it is, is the land between Algeria and Morocco that has long been in dispute. The Sahrawi people fled Morocco 35 years ago and have been in camps on the Algerian side of the border ever since, fighting for self-determination. I was not entirely sure what to expect out of this trip, but I hopped on my plane to Paris amidst a chorus of questions and concerns from my friends and family.

The morning after our arrival in the Western Sahara, we went to the February 27th camp to meet with the head of the women’s school and wound up in the middle of a Sahrawi heritage festival. Standing on the edge of the parade, listening to the music and watching the dancing, I quickly forgot any reservations I had and was drawn to the women and children. They wore bright tye-dyed malfas, beads, and jewelry. They smiled at us and welcomed us into their tents for tea and taught us how to play games. They were beautiful and confident and gracious, and I immediately realized that whatever subconscious preconceived notions I had about their culture, I’d been wrong.

I learned quickly that my concerns were totally unnecessary, and that the Sahrawi women were breaking all my stereotypes. Many left their faces uncovered, they held positions of power in government. They were well educated, and fought hard against the oppressive Moroccan regime. There was a sense that the women had more to lose in the battle than men – they were fighting for their freedom with everything they had.

Women at the festival. Note the cell phone.

Me with the women who were making tea for us.

The festival itself was a celebration of the Sahrawi people. The flags they waved read “Sahara Libre” across the bottom. They laughed and danced and watched children sing traditional songs. Substitute a decorated convertible for the camels and replace the dusty Sahara ground with Main Street and it wasn’t unlike a small town parade in America. We wandered around and purchased jewelry from the merchants and spoke to many of the people in the town, who seemed nothing but grateful to have Americans in their midst. Most of them spoke 2 and 3 languages, making it easy to communicate and ask questions… and making me feel the part of the ignorant American who only spoke English and a bit of pathetic Spanish.

Sahara Libre

Later in the week, we had the opportunity to meet with Nana Rachid, the Director of the Union of Saharwi Women. I was so taken with her and what she had to say – our meeting was easily one of the highlights of my week. She was beautiful, confident and incredibly intelligent, laughing easily and happy to spend a time taking questions. She focused on the level of education, touting their 95% literacy rate (100% in people under the age of 35 – the period of time since they moved to the camps). She spoke of the small business loans for women, enabling them to start up agricultural and textile businesses. The women raise their children, work hard outside the home, and are treated with respect. They divorce and remarry, and are entitled to the house and children in the instance of a split. Nana spoke of her disdain for men who take multiple wives and the practice of arranged marriages (although we understood from other conversations that there may be some men who did have more than one wife). She was in the process of having her 4th book published, both in Arabic and French, and expressed interest in having her poetry translated into English.

Nana Rachid and myself.

Another one of the women we had the opportunity to meet with was Mariam Salek Hamada, the Minister of Education. She fled to the camps in 1975, at the age of nine, and began her career as a teacher in the early 90′s. By 2004 she had been appointed Minister of Education. Judging by the caliber of the people we had the privilege to interact with, she does her job well.

After meeting the Sahrawis and experiencing first-hand how incredibly well educated they seemed to be, this was a meeting of particular interest. In 1975, when the Sahrawis fled Morocco and the men were off fighting, the women were left on the oases with the children. They began “school” by doing math problems and writing in the sand with sticks or scratching things onto stone. They now they have their own school buildings in each camp, special accommodations for children with disabilities, and universities. Their biggest problems remain a shortage of supplies (books, paper, pencils, etc) and educating teachers. As far as continuing education, they struggle to find places that will scholarship the education of their doctors and other advanced degrees. They tend to have more in common with Latin cultures, in part because of the Spanish influence, but also because much of the Arab world believes them to be too free. They begged us to bring their students to the United States for higher education, explaining that only Cuba, Spain, Libya, Venezuela and Mexico would take their students.

The difference between the Sahrawi people and the other refugees I’ve encountered was simple: hope. They are there because they choose to be, and they believe that they will soon be independent. They don’t believe that they will live in camps forever, and they have a vision for what their people can accomplish. Their will is strong, and their fight for freedom is one that should resonate with all of us.

Tabitha Hale is the New Media Director at FreedomWorks, and visited the camps in December 2010. She did not receive any payment for this trip from any government or from the Polisario. It was privately funded by the Defense Forum Foundation.

Journey to the Western Sahara.

Last month I was invited to the Western Sahara to report on a conflict I knew nothing about. Without even thinking about it, I responded with my characteristic “Hell yeah, I’ll go.” I mean, sleeping on the floor of refugee camps is sort of my thing. Why not?

So on December 6th I boarded a plane to Paris, then on to Algiers. We landed in Algiers and were met by amabassadors who took us to lunch in town. It was meat on a skewer, bread and dates, basically, but it was wonderful – and really nice to see some of the city before we headed off into the middle of the desert.

Meat skewers - we picked out our own and they threw them on the grill. Lamb, chicken, sausage, and some sort of kidney we were so not brave enough to try.

We returned to the airport to pick up the Chicago contingent of our delegation and left several hours after planned. We learned later, while talking to a group of people from a huge Spanish delegation, that they refer to Air Algerie as “Insha’Allah Air”, or “If God Wills it”… apparently they’re even less reliable than the airlines around here. We did, however, make it to Tindouf in one piece and were transported by Land Rover (the official vehicle of the Western Sahara) to our compound.

We stayed on a chicken farm on an oasis about half an hour outside of Tindouf. Don’t know where tindouf is? You’re most likely not alone. Here’s a map:

So, really far away from everything. Now let me give you a little bit of background on the conflict we were investigating.

Back in 1975, Spain began the process of decolonizing Morocco, and held meetings with the Polisario leaders to negotiate the independence of the Saharawis. The UN became involved and went to the Saharawis to gather information on public opinion – did these people actually want independence? The answer was resoundingly yes. Morocco, however, invaded the Western Sahara on November 6th and a bloody battle ensued. The Saharawis left in protest, setting up the four camps on Algerian soil – this territory is where I spent all of last week.

From the moment we arrived, I was impressed with the Saharawis. They were beautiful – vibrant clothing, animated in their conversation, and incredibly hospitable. Over the course of the next few days we met with the President, the President’s wife, the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Parliament, the Defense Minister, the Education Minister, the head of the Red Crescent, and the head of a Saharawi women’s organization. We toured hospitals, schools, museums, and camps, and slept in the home of a refugee family. Everywhere we went, there was only one request: Tell Americans our story.

Right now, Morocco is spending billions on this fight, arming the 1,200+ mile Berm on the border of the Western Sahara and now lobbying the US Congress with propaganda about the supposed horrendous conditions in the camps and information on how the Algerian government is holding these people hostage. One thing was clear from everyone we spoke to: The Saharawis are in camps in voluntary protest. No one is holding them against their will. They are incredibly well educated, and the only hostility I encountered was from a woman who was upset that the United States, the freest nation in the world, wouldn’t recognize their fight to be independent.

It’s taken me a few days to process everything, but over the next few days I will be posting several articles about the trip, focusing on the women, the culture, and their fight for self determination. Please feel free to ask questions, and send this information around, and look into the conflict for yourself. The Saharawis are an incredible group of people, and it was an honor to get to spend time with them.

Free Western Sahara!