Tag Archives: Democrats

Are Democrats losing their hold over women?

Politico had a great article today on women in the Tea Party movement.

It’s clear that woman have been a driving force in this movement, probably more than ever before on the Right. It can be attributed to a lot of things, not the least of which is, as Darla DeWald said in the Politico piece, is the “mama bear” instinct that kicks in when women feel that their children are at risk. Now that it’s clear that the issues at hand are going to effect every child in this country, the maternal instincts are kicking in. Mothers will fight for their children.

This potentially points to a greater problems for Democrats in upcoming months. Women have largely swung toward the Democratic party for ages. The reasons have been hashed out over and over, but here are some quick bullet points:

  • Women as a whole make less money. Therefore, they are generally in a tougher spot when they are single/divorced. Democratic platforms are all about a safety net for when one is vulnerable.
  • Abortion. The idea of it being outlawed is a sticking point for many women, who feel threatened at the idea of losing that option. In addition, a majority of the modern feminist movement bases their entire existence on trying to fight those evil Republicans that are trying to “police their wombs”. Or something. Which is funny when you consider the health care legislation they were so excited about getting rammed through.
  • The Democratic party has worked to paint themselves as the champions of the downtrodden. Poor people, minorities, and women have long been beholden to the false sense of security that the Democratic party strives to provide. See: first pullet point.

So what’s changing now? The fact that, despite claiming to provide a safety net, Democrats are losing popularity. They have passed legislation that the Left has been fighting to pass for 50 years. They have control of the House, Senate, and White House. They should be riding high… but they’re not. And this is in no small part because of the women that are becoming a loud, fierce voice in this battle.

Nancy Pelosi, as the highest ranking female elected official in the country, has tried to spin nearly every issue as a women’s issue. She did it with climate change. She did it with health care. And let’s face it, in the past, this has been a winner for the Democrats. The ladies, however, aren’t buying it.

Maybe it’s because some of those women who have been chanting “hands off my body” for 40 years finally realized that government involvement means that they’re involved when it’s inconvenient too. Maybe women on the left are realizing that they are more than their uterus, and that there is more to “women’s rights” than abortion. Maybe it’s because those same women want freedom for their daughters. Who knows. The bottom line is that some of the biggest political players on the Right in the past year have been women, and that is likely to continue. Some of the most passionate, effective activists and minds springing up out of this movement have been women. Smart Girl Politics has been on the forefront of the conservative women’s movement, and has provided a unique outlet for women to connect, learn, and mobilize locally. The beauty of all this? Women are drawn to other women in leadership, and the effect has been a groundswell of new female voters, candidates, and activists on the Right.

Nancy Pelosi’s thinly veiled attempt to make this health care legislation a win for women’s rights was laughable. Just a reminder from RedState’s Lori Ziganto of how this bill actually effects women:

Because a quick search of the product classification database shows just how much women, and particularly Moms, will be punitively taxed. Tampons will be taxed; we are hereby punished not just by our monthly visitor, but because of it. Breast pumps will be taxed.  Those of us who are “punished by a baby”,  will now truly be punished monetarily by Congress for choosing (so much for choice!) to breast feed our children. What happened to wanting women to have it all? You are punishing women who work and need to pump to provide the best possible sustenance to their infants. It’s organic; I thought y’all liked that? Or is that just another thing to which you merely pay lip service for political expediency and “cool” points?

Birth control will now be more expensive as well, including diaphragms and condoms. Condoms, hmm, what shall we call that one? The roll-down tax? I suppose they figure who cares if people can’t afford condoms. Who needs personal responsibility? Pesky pregnancies won’t be a problem; abortions will be fully funded! That’s feminism for you. You’ve come a long way, baby! They should probably change that phrase, since they don’t seem to care much for actual babies.

So… what was this about Republicans punishing you for having girly plumbing? We’re not buying it anymore, Nancy. The bottom line is that unless the Dems find a way to stop the bleeding they’re going to pay for it in November. In fact, I’m banking on that very thing.

GOP: Standing in the way of Utopia.

Because clearly they’re entirely too accomodating to dissenting viewpoints.

If anything, the Democrats’ problem is that they permit too much dissent—unlike the Republicans, who demand “lockstep marching.” In fact, if Democrats would learn to be just a little less tolerant of dissent, they might get a lot more done.

Yeah, they just get STEAMROLLED. Poor little Democrats, bullied by the Republicans over and over again. Like that time they kept the House floor open to make sure that Republicans also had time to speak. Or maybe that time they took the time to hear the concerns of the public on the stimulus package before it was rammed through.

Or maybe when they listened so closely to concerns about health care. They were SO RECEPTIVE to widespread concern that President Obama didn’t have to go on TV 4 times a day for an entire 3 month stretch to say the SAME THING over and over. Republicans were just bastards who didn’t bother offering any other plans.

Uh, right. (Side note: I need a sarcasm font desperately.)

They have done everything in their power to silence protesters and dissenting voices. Period. The media coverage has been laughable.

They have a 60 seat supermajority in the Senate. They have a 70 seat advantage in the House. They have a President who is willing to ram through as much horrible legislation as possible. They don’t need one Republican to accomplish anything. Not one nasty little GOPer has the ability to stand in the way of the their Utopian society under Team Lightbringer.

I have no patience for the pity game. Man up, lefties. You have the power to do whatever you want. You claim the the whole world wants your version of America. In the words of our President, “the stars have aligned”. Why aren’t you making this happen?

Democrats are realizing that their constituents don’t want them to support these proposals. They’re risking their jobs by consistently casting “yes” votes for bad bills. We are the ones that hired them. We have the ability to fire them.

WE are the ones standing in their way- you, me, and everyone else who has voiced their opposition. Keep holding their feet to the fire.

If I Hear The Word "Bipartisan" One More Time…

“Bipartisan” and “reaching across the aisle” are both terms that make me want to send my fist through a wall. Let’s have a chat about my favorite buzzword.

Exhibit A: Obama won. Which means he is now supreme ruler, and his opinion on tax policy (as well as all other matters, I presume) is now law. Or something like that. Oh yeah, and then there’s this:

“If we don’t get this done we (the Democrats) could lose seats and I could lose re-election. But we can’t let people like Rush Limbaugh stall this. That’s how things don’t get done in this town.”

It took him all of what, a week in office to start thinking re-election? Give us a break. Clearly you won, you got you $150 million party, now get to work. You’ve got 300 million supervisors now – you work for US, Obama. Don’t forget it. Anyway, I digress.

There’s nothing bipartisan about stepping into a congressional meeting and rallying Democrats against Rush and talking about re-election. Period. You don’t achieve a “bipartisan” attitude by actively working to eliminate the other party from day one.

Exhibit B: The House vote this week. The GOP finally united – in opposition to the Dems. Well played GOP.

The point of all this? Bipartisanship doesn’t exist. Hear that? It’s a crock. I threw this question out on Twitter today and was amazed by the number of conservatives who felt it was a necessary evil. Necessary for what? IT DOESN’T ACCOMPLISH ANYTHING. And we need to get over the idea that it ever will. The definition of bipartisanship is nothing but this: Republicans being spineless. Period. It is never shown to increase effectiveness or unite anyone.

The only thing it DOES manage to accomplish is conservative guilt. It’s a product of the squishy hopey changey rhetoric we’ve been getting from Washington all year. I have no use for a term that dilutes what I’m trying to achieve. I picture it sort of like a Punnett Square. Conservatism is the recessive trait in our government. When paired with a liberal gene, it stays in the background, where it can be invisible. This is not a good compromise, ya’ll.

This is NOT a necessary evil. And I’m sick of being guilted into watching the GOP play nice with people who have no interest in reciprocating the sentiment. This is the reason we have forgotten what we stand for.

Brodigan gets his second shout out this week with this definition: Bi-Partisanship (n. b?-?pär-t?-z?n-ship) Word media uses to guilt Republicans into bending over to Democrats.

Period.

What Reagan's Legacy Should Teach Us.

Reagan

I’m really sick of people telling us to stop looking back at Reagan.  Ronald Reagan was the best leader our country has seen.  He was everything that our country stands for.  He bucked large, bureaucratic government.  He united this country in a fundamental way, appealing to the ideals that every American should share. His presidency was about optimism, heart, and “peace through strength”. Taxes were cut. Inflation was curbed. Unemployment was low.

The GOP is dead. Democrats have swung further and further to the left, and the GOP had tried to hang on to elections by meeting them in the middle.  What that gave us was the miserable failure that was Nov. 4, 2008.  We lost the presidency, the House, and Senate, with the Supreme Court soon to follow. What Ronald Reagan showed us was that when you govern by the constitution, everyone benefits.  It’s a completely non-partisan issue. You cannot break the backbone of the country and expect it to stand. Period.

I’m so sick of hearing the word “bi-partisan”. It doesn’t work. We’ve seen over and over that it sets us up for failure, and we’ve ended up with what is sure to be the most liberal leadership our country has ever seen. I think we HAVE to look back to Reagan right now. Learn from history. We learn what not to do, as well as what TO do. His legacy provides a roadmap for what our government should look like, and clearly, the GOP needs to be taking notes.

Conclusion: If the GOP insists on pulling further and further to the left, conservatives need to reevaluate. Kick out the current leadership and start over, or start a new party. Maybe it’s finally the right time. I’ll be profiling some of the up and coming leaders that I would like to see head up a conservative movement here over the next week or so. Stay tuned.

Just a few Reagan quotes to cheer you up.

A people free to choose will always choose peace.”

Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged.”

Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.”

Republicans believe every day is the Fourth of July, but the democrats believe every day is April 15.