Tag Archives: gay

Open Letter To Lefty Haters

Dear Lefty Hater,

I cannot wrap my brain around your definition of tolerance. In real life, tolerance means this:

tol·er·ance

Pronunciation:
?tä-l?-r?n(t)s, ?täl-r?n(t)s
Function:
noun

1: capacity to endure pain or hardship : endurance , fortitude , stamina

2 a: sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own b: the act of allowing something :toleration

3: the allowable deviation from a standard ; especially : the range of variation permitted in maintaining a specified dimension in machining a piece

This means allowing for deviation from YOUR standard, too. Quite honestly, though, I’m not entirely sure what your standards are. According to your non-discriminatory, politically correct rhetoric, anything goes. After all, we wouldn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Feelings are more important than logic and reason, right? We must do everything we can to avoid stepping on toes.

By my interpretation, your definition of “tolerance” extends to anyone who is not rich, white, Christian, or male. And Lord help you if you all in to all of the above. What happens when the oppressors become the oppressed? Who is there to defend those rights?

Rich people are targeted with higher taxes and demonized for their wealth. Do you not see the hypocrisy in the fact that 7/10 of the wealthiest senators are democrats? In the fact that Obama outspent McCain nearly 10-1? In the fact that among your most vocal supporters are Hollywood millionaires and billionaires, a la Oprah, Streisand, etc.?

I discussed yesterday how Christians are consistently demonized. I won’t rehash that, yet that still stands. It seems that your tolerance extends to non-Christians, gay people, minorities, and poor people. You act as a loud, obnoxious advocates, and generally pander to these groups until they completely submit – you own them, and you know it. After all, once a young, struggling, single mom has become dependent on WIC, how could she vote for someone who would take that away and risk her child’s welfare? After someone has been on welfare their whole life, how can we expect them to put someone in office who will remove their security blanket? The answer is simple – they won’t.

Start giving people the respect they deserve. Teach them that they are valuable, and then SHOW them you believe in them by setting the bar high. Stop providing easy ways out, and people will manage. People should be tested sometimes – how else will they know what they’re made of? Stop blaming rich, white men for your problems – many of you fall into the same category.Take responsibility. The world is not out to get you – you can choose not to hate.

Signed,

A broke but self-sufficient Christian white girl.

Calling in Gay…

So, tomorrow is “Day without a Gay“. Or whatever you want to call it – basically, the gay community has decided that they need to prove their worth by showing the rest of us that we cannot function without them

My statement to the gay community is this: We know that you’re valuable. You’re people. You hold jobs, you have families. You, as a human being, are indispensable to those that love you, and are a part of our nation. Shirking the responsibilities that go along with that isn’t a way to prove anything. You want equality and acceptance – why do you try so hard to separate yourselves with special laws, and demonstrations like this? All you’re doing is increasing resentment in those that will have to pick up the slack for you tomorrow.

I suppose I understand the premise. But I’m pretty sure the world won’t stop spinning. After all, the estimated 15 million illegal immigrants called in illegal back in 2006 (I’m not sure who thought that one through…) and we’re still here.

When will people figure out that voluntary segregation does NOT beget equality?

Gay Marriage: An Equal Rights Disaster

Clearly, gay marriage is the hot topic right now. Suffice it to say that I think of marriage as a religious ceremony and I think the government needs to stay out of it – separation of church and state and all. However, now we are in this mess and the government has once again found themselves stuck between a rock and hard place, trying to mandate morality.

Here is my take: Were I in the position to vote on Prop 8, I would vote yes. However, I will spare you all the social con speech and preaching.  Here’s my take from an equal rights stance: The effects of defeating Prop 8 are too great. The slippery slope argument gets so overused that I’m not going to spend a lot of time on it, but I think it holds. After all, the core of the gay marriage argument is equality. How can we POSSIBLY be so discriminatory? What about the bisexual who wants to marry their female and male partners? Who are we to judge? And the girl that grows up and falls in love with her brother – why can’t they marry? Who are we to vote on love, right?

Beyond that, the backlash would be a huge infringement on the rights of, say, the other 95% of the population. Case in point: the pastors and rabbis that will perform the weddings. How long before churches and religious leaders get attacked and abused and sued for refusing to perform weddings that they will not support? The entire religious community is, at large, put in a horrible position. Do they fold, like eHarmony? No, the stakes are much, MUCH greater for someone who is a Christ follower, and is pastoring others. Eternity is involved.

And what about the rights of the states that have banned gay marriage? The majority of the people spoke, and by forcing states that have applied the ban to honor that marriage, you are infringing on their rights. They chose, as a group, to support traditional marriage.

Let me be clear: I am not denouncing civil unions. I support them. And there are no calls to impose bans on cohabitation and other aspects of the relationship. Freedom is still freedom, and God allows us to make our own choices, and their sin is no greater than my own. That said, allowing marriage in the gay community would be disastrous for equal rights, and our country as a whole.