Tag Archives: Liberals

Hate Mail of the Day

Language warning. As always. He’s a charmer.

Subject: ur a cunt

Sender: Tyler Garrison (tyler.garrison@rocketmail.com)

Recipient: Tabitha Hale (tabitha@tabithahale.com)

Date: December 31st, 2009 10:57am

Body:

your trying to ruin the best thing that has happened to this country since your prsident fucked everything up. why don’t you just shut the fuck up and get a real job? its people like you who caused all these problems and now that we’re trying to fixthem you get your fucking pantis in a wad. just shut the fuck up you cunt. you’re a fat bitch who does nothing but divide our country and want people to die from no health care. fuck you. i hope you get a disease and die from it because you can’t afford insurance.go choke on a cuntrag.


GOP: Standing in the way of Utopia.

Because clearly they’re entirely too accomodating to dissenting viewpoints.

If anything, the Democrats’ problem is that they permit too much dissent—unlike the Republicans, who demand “lockstep marching.” In fact, if Democrats would learn to be just a little less tolerant of dissent, they might get a lot more done.

Yeah, they just get STEAMROLLED. Poor little Democrats, bullied by the Republicans over and over again. Like that time they kept the House floor open to make sure that Republicans also had time to speak. Or maybe that time they took the time to hear the concerns of the public on the stimulus package before it was rammed through.

Or maybe when they listened so closely to concerns about health care. They were SO RECEPTIVE to widespread concern that President Obama didn’t have to go on TV 4 times a day for an entire 3 month stretch to say the SAME THING over and over. Republicans were just bastards who didn’t bother offering any other plans.

Uh, right. (Side note: I need a sarcasm font desperately.)

They have done everything in their power to silence protesters and dissenting voices. Period. The media coverage has been laughable.

They have a 60 seat supermajority in the Senate. They have a 70 seat advantage in the House. They have a President who is willing to ram through as much horrible legislation as possible. They don’t need one Republican to accomplish anything. Not one nasty little GOPer has the ability to stand in the way of the their Utopian society under Team Lightbringer.

I have no patience for the pity game. Man up, lefties. You have the power to do whatever you want. You claim the the whole world wants your version of America. In the words of our President, “the stars have aligned”. Why aren’t you making this happen?

Democrats are realizing that their constituents don’t want them to support these proposals. They’re risking their jobs by consistently casting “yes” votes for bad bills. We are the ones that hired them. We have the ability to fire them.

WE are the ones standing in their way- you, me, and everyone else who has voiced their opposition. Keep holding their feet to the fire.

The Violent Conservative Lie

The Left has been painting protestors as violent, angry, riotous mobs. I think of the the same way as I think of their “Republicans are idiots” meme. It’s a way to discredit the opposition without actually tackling their ideas. This escalated around the time of the Tea Parties, which the racism accusations and the like being perpetuated by MS-NBC, CNN, etc. Not to mention the Janeane Garafolos and Joy Behars of the world.

Are their fringe right wingers who have been violent? Yes. But the majority of us cringe when we see them. I have been to many a Tea Party where I want to tear the signs out of people’s hands and ask them what the heck they’re thinking. However, to classify us as violent because of a few extremists that show up at Tea Parties is false.

Let’s look in the mirror, lefties. Case in point: Van Jones. I’ll let the videos do the talking.

Phil Kerpen summed it up on Fox and Friends this summer:

And he said himself that he was radicalized in jail, that he found communism and anarchism. And then he started a pretty radical, kind of communist, socialist, utopian group that was supposed to end all racism though central planning. And then he decided that the real path the sort of progressive nirvana, was the this green jobs idea.

So how do these people get through? Gibbs claims that the President doesn’t condone Jones’ past statements or actions. WaPo explains:

A White House official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter, said Jones’s past was not studied as intensively as other advisers because of his relatively low rank.

Jones’s position did not require Senate confirmation, so he avoided the kind of vetting Cabinet officials were subjected to.

Don’t you love the anonymity? Anyway, he didn’t get the same vetting as Cabinet officials. Because he’s a czar. And czars don’t need confirmation. Which is my whole issue with them… unchecked power is bad, kids.

Then we have the commentators. Formerly civil TV host Montel Williams released this gem on his radio broadcast this week:

WILLIAMS (1:30:32): Michelle, slit your wrist.

Go ahead… or, do us all a better thing [sic].

Move that knife up about two feet.

Start right at the collarbone.

(H/T Michelle Malkin)

Nancy Pelosi has been vocal in her active demonization of protesters as well, stating that we’re an angry mob sporting swastikas. Here’s a great article from the Washington Times on Pelosi’s “Visions of Swastikas“.

And remember last week, when a 65 year old man got his finger bitten off by an Obamacare supporter from MoveOn.org?

Damon Root at the Sun Times published an article on the history of violence from the left, concluding with this:

“Have some ugly views cropped up at the recent health-care protests? Sure. But to take that as evidence of a centurylong battle between enlightened liberal reformers and knuckle-dragging laissez-faire racist goons is to believe in a self-serving fairy tale.

It’s time for any pundit who thinks that way to grow up.”

I couldn’t have summed it up better myself, Damon.


Now we're treasonists. Awesome.

So in my reading today I managed to stumble upon this article from the Daily Mississippian. Apparently, the conservative activists are nothing but a bunch of partisan fanatics who tote guns and should be viewed as a threat to President Obama’s life. No, I’m not making this up.

Now, I am not criticizing Republicans for supporting their beliefs, but things are growing out of control. Their disapproval of President Obama has recently bordered on treason.

Protesters have held signs reading “Down with Obama,” and other rather dangerous quotes. At one of the president’s speeches, one protester was seen carrying an automatic assault rifle.

Normally, this would constitute a danger to the president’s life, but instead of suffering a penalty for this infraction, the man was praised by Fox News as some sort of hero.

Well, at least he did us the favor of leaving out the race issue this time, because Lord knows he managed to get everything else wrong. First of all, there was nothing threatening about the protester with the gun. He was exercising his 2nd Amendment right, and if there had actually been any threatening behavior, I can guarantee you they would have been all over it. But since it was legal, the best they could do was let Contessa Brewer and the MSBNC crew mangle the footage and portray it as a racist statement. Well done.

He then goes in to the Birther issue. If he’d done his research, he’d see that the vast majority of conservatives are dismissing Birthers as a fringe group. No one wants them representing our movement. They’re the equivalent of the left’s Truthers. I suppose Van Jones has shown us that Democrats don’t much care about that issue, however, and are content to be associated with their fringe, so I suppose I can see where Johnson got confused.

As far as the injuries and violence he claims are resulting from the Town Hall Protests… I wish he’d enlighten me instead of making vague assertions. Because really, the couple violent epsodes that come to mind, including the man who got his finger eaten off, all involved union thugs and MoveOn.org members.

There is no place for violence in this debate. I thought we Americans were supposed to be intelligent and respectful people. What has changed to cause this much anger amongst the people?

Plus, this type of behavior is fueling many supremacist organizations. They are using the tense climate surrounding these debates to sucker impressionable young conservatives into their warped mind sets. I fear that soon violence will break loose and this country will be in hot water.

Supremacist organizations? Are you kidding me? Like what? And us poor impressionable young conservatives. I’m sure they’re nothing like the poor impressionable KINDERGARTNERS that received a speech from the President on their first day back in school. Like the college students that are indoctrinated by their professors and text books.

Johnson then rants about Glenn Beck, who he identifies as “criminally insane” and calls for “young Republican men and women” to rise up and reclaim our party.

This is so not a partisan issue, Rakeem Johnson. This is a Constitution issue. This is a freedom issue. This is an American issue. It has nothing to do with bitter Republicans, and you’d be hard pressed to find a Conservative who thinks that Republicans are getting it right.

This is not some kind of liberal left-wing propaganda. I do not consider myself affiliated with either party. But I do believe that things need to change.

Oh, okay. Thanks for clearing that up. And glad you provided us and the citizens of Mississippi with such an “unaffiliated” perspective.

Thanks for that.

Open Letter To Lefty Haters

Dear Lefty Hater,

I cannot wrap my brain around your definition of tolerance. In real life, tolerance means this:

tol·er·ance

Pronunciation:
?tä-l?-r?n(t)s, ?täl-r?n(t)s
Function:
noun

1: capacity to endure pain or hardship : endurance , fortitude , stamina

2 a: sympathy or indulgence for beliefs or practices differing from or conflicting with one’s own b: the act of allowing something :toleration

3: the allowable deviation from a standard ; especially : the range of variation permitted in maintaining a specified dimension in machining a piece

This means allowing for deviation from YOUR standard, too. Quite honestly, though, I’m not entirely sure what your standards are. According to your non-discriminatory, politically correct rhetoric, anything goes. After all, we wouldn’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Feelings are more important than logic and reason, right? We must do everything we can to avoid stepping on toes.

By my interpretation, your definition of “tolerance” extends to anyone who is not rich, white, Christian, or male. And Lord help you if you all in to all of the above. What happens when the oppressors become the oppressed? Who is there to defend those rights?

Rich people are targeted with higher taxes and demonized for their wealth. Do you not see the hypocrisy in the fact that 7/10 of the wealthiest senators are democrats? In the fact that Obama outspent McCain nearly 10-1? In the fact that among your most vocal supporters are Hollywood millionaires and billionaires, a la Oprah, Streisand, etc.?

I discussed yesterday how Christians are consistently demonized. I won’t rehash that, yet that still stands. It seems that your tolerance extends to non-Christians, gay people, minorities, and poor people. You act as a loud, obnoxious advocates, and generally pander to these groups until they completely submit – you own them, and you know it. After all, once a young, struggling, single mom has become dependent on WIC, how could she vote for someone who would take that away and risk her child’s welfare? After someone has been on welfare their whole life, how can we expect them to put someone in office who will remove their security blanket? The answer is simple – they won’t.

Start giving people the respect they deserve. Teach them that they are valuable, and then SHOW them you believe in them by setting the bar high. Stop providing easy ways out, and people will manage. People should be tested sometimes – how else will they know what they’re made of? Stop blaming rich, white men for your problems – many of you fall into the same category.Take responsibility. The world is not out to get you – you can choose not to hate.

Signed,

A broke but self-sufficient Christian white girl.

Through The Eyes Of A Liberal: GOP Change

So someone tweeted this post yesterday, and if I could remember who it was I’d give credit. Just a heads up: language warning. Lots of it is liberal hate speech but I want to touch on a few things, since I think what he’s saying about GOP is pretty much in line with the rest of the left. I’m censoring what I quote.

Global Warming is Real – Even if you don’t believe it, the rest of the world does. That means you have to accept the reality of the situation and adjust accordingly. Suddenly it is cool to be eco-friendly and you guys are still the party that wants to drill in ANWAR. Even if you take the approach of “we don’t necessarily believe in it, but we are going to scale back efforts to <mess> up our environment just in case” that would be leaps and bounds ahead of your current strategy.

No and no. I’m all for taking care of the environment. Yeah, we make a mess of things and should clean it up. I do know that energy independence is critical, and I support drilling wherever there is oil. Our relations with the Middle East and Latin America depend on it. And if we are a nation that values the rights of polar bears over those of unborn children, we have way bigger things to deal with.

Education is Cool – Nominating Sarah Palin told the world that the GOP endorses stupidity. Cut. That. <junk>. Out. Even if you manage to elect a candidate that is obviously a moron, the truth will eventually come out. Didn’t we just go through this with 8 years of Bush? Hasn’t he effectively shown that electing unqualified people isn’t a good idea?

First of all, you’d be hard pressed to find a conservative who still supports Bush. Yes, I acknowledge that the GOP is not conservative anymore. Even so, I’d be willing to wager that most of the GOP faithful aren’t behind him either. Second, are we really still playing the Palin is stupid card? That seems to be the best course of action for the left when they can’t find anything else to shred her for. Did anyone listen to Biden throughout the campaign? Not only did he make FAR more detrimental gaffes, he has 36 years in the Senate behind him… shouldn’t he know better? Palin was an unbelievably quick study.

We want to talk about unqualified? I hate even validating this statement with a response, so I’ll keep it brief. No one has been able to show me one thing that Obama accomplished. Palin has done exceptionally well in her current office. Running a state requires a whole lot more intelligence than voting “present”. If we’re being completely honest, this whole conversation is irrelevant since Palin was running for VP and Obama’s campaign was for POTUS.

Stop Fighting Evolution – This is a hopeless battle that, in the long run, you won’t win. In fact, fighting this is just drawing resources away from more important issues. You need to tell you constituents that if they really believing in Intelligent Design, then they should teach it to their kids at home. End of story, move on.

I think part of this is true – it IS drawing resources away from more pressing issues. However, the ending statement completely lost me. Intelligent Design is a viable alternative to evolution and should be taught as such. Saying it should be taught at home when you fight so hard for public sex education, however,  is a logic fail. Personally, I think THAT is what should be taught at home. I’d much rather teach my kid what they need to know about sex and let a teacher handle the theory of evolution. What kind of parent gets offended by the Intelligent Design teaching, but allows their kid to learn about sex from a stranger?

The Internet is Important – If you looked at the top 20% of Internet movers & shakers you would find that they are virtually all Democrats. And why are they Democrats? Because the Republicans have done their best to let the Telecoms, the RIAA and the MPAA run the Internet as they see fit. The DMCA is perhaps the best example of how conservatives don’t get it. You are doing your best to alienate a key group of young, intelligent, industrious innovators.  Brush them off at your own peril. (incidentally, if you think I’m blowing this out of proportion look at Obama’s grassroots movement on the web and then look at McCain’s. Nuff said)

This point is one that we should take to heart. We absolutely dropped the ball on the internet campaign. 100%. I’m glad to see the movement on here now, and we need to keep the ball rolling forward. Groups like Smart Girl Politics, The New Republican, The Next Right, #dontgo, and #TCOT are moving us in the right direction. We need to keep that momentum going.

But by far the craziest has to be the notion that in order to fix the party the GOP has to become more conservative. Ok stop, you’re doing it wrong. You aren’t going to win anymore Presidential elections by campaigning harder in the South.

***

After all, Obama (if you haven’t noticed) is a centrist. And he will no doubt pull the Democratic party more into the mainstream. So what core issue will Republicans run on? Defending the country from terrorism? Good luck with that. Gay marriage is from the devil? Not enough people will care. Fiscal responsibility? Ha ha ha ha ha.

Wow. Could this be any more inaccurate? If we move any further to the left we will be to the left of a lot of Democrats. Conservatives are everywhere, and if Obama does 1/4 of what he says he’ll do, our country will implode and conservatives will be the ones rebuilding it.

Obama is a CENTRIST? His abortion stance is enough to remove that one. Take in to account his blatant redistribution push, his health care stance, and his plan to slash military spending, he is anything BUT a centrist. That just makes my head hurt. If you’re so far to the left that you think Obama is a centrist there may be no hope for you.

The end question, however is a good one. What DO we stand for? In my eyes, that should be small government, accountability for individuals and businesses, and minimal government spending. If we can’t lock down these basic principles, there really is no difference between us and the democrats, and we will be absorbed.

Republicans: We're Happy Because We Don't Care.

Slightly dated but I just found it. Pew Research released a study saying that Republicans are over all happier than Democrats. Here are the numbers...

I think it’s pretty obvious why we’re happier overall. We just don’t care about anything. Every single American conservative drives a gas guzzling SUV home to our 4000 sq ft home in the suburbs where we sit around and watch HD cable on our 77” plasmas. Then we break out bottles of fine wine and curl up on the couch and never glance at the world beyond the edge of the gated communities we live in.

We have never been through a difficult time in our sheltered lives and are completely out of touch with all the pain and suffering in the world. And we go out of our way to throw things at homeless people and kill kittens. It’s easy to be this happy when you just ignore the environment, poor people, minorities and world hunger.

Maybe if we all just stopped caring completely the world would be a happier place. Ignorance is bliss, right?

(Just to clarify – I live in the ghetto, drive a used Nissan, and don’t own a TV.)

Why Liberals Hate us.

As a Conservative,  I have been labeled closed-minded, harsh, intolerant, and I’m sure many, many other things behind my back. The thing is, that’s standard fare. We’re called racist, homophobic, misogynist ogres on a regular basis. A lot of times worse. Why is that? What makes us so hate-able?

The very principles that define liberalism require liberals to detest  conservatives. They really can’t help it. To them, change and “progress” are everything. If things are not changing, then they must be backwards and irrelevant. They are conditioned to despise the way things are, and focus on what could be. The problem with this is that some things are what they are because they are supposed to be that way. Some change is necessary. Conservatives understand that it’s ridiculous to try and reinvent things for the sake of “progress”.

I have a confession. I like the idea of liberalism. I think that it’s a really pretty picture. Everyone has health care, housing, food, and general financial support. Those that have more helping those that have less. I’m a Christian. I love the idea of everyone being taken care of. I do understand why they have the vote of youth yearning for an idyllic world.

However, that I also know that it doesn’t work in real life. It’s a generally accepted idea that socialism and communism are epic failures in practice. So why is America headed in that direction? Because, as a nation, we’re not calling it what it is. There was a glimmer of hope when Obama’s answer to Joe The Plumber’s question was played everywhere. That wasn’t enough to convince America that we’re headed down the slippery socialist path.They shouted even louder and discredited Joe instead of focusing on Obama’s answer – which was the heart of the problem.

When we use the words “socialism” or “Marxism”, liberals and the media (one in the same, in most cases) write it off as far right hyperbole. They make it sound like we’re being so ridiculous that no one could POSSIBLY take us seriously. And the masses, who don’t know anything the media doesn’t tell them, listen. They shroud their message in feel-good “hopeandchange” rhetoric – the nation follows blindly.

Why do they listen? Because the liberal voice is so much louder than the conservative one. By their very “progressive”, uninhibited, self-empowered nature, liberals are more vocal. They value rule-breaking and pushing limits, and are willing to do so if it will get them heard. This is the root of the corruption, riots, and outspoken hatred of all that is conservative. They shout loudly enough that they cannot be ignored.

Our best course of action? Be the stability that our country needs. Stick with the basic conservative ideals. Our principles are the rock that this country is founded on. Liberals can only shout for so long – they will eventually lose their voices. What do we have to say once they are silent? Be ready.

Why Liberalism is Dangerous.

I understand why people are liberals. Who doesn’t want free stuff? “Equality”?  It sounds so pretty. Help the downtrodden. Make everyone equal. Everyone should be taken care of. The “rich” people don’t mind paying for your health care. Obama provides, after all. Bush single-handedly destroyed the world, and now Obamessiah will save us.

I already wrote about my take on socialism and why I don’t believe that works from a spiritual angle. Here’s the meat of it:

This may be politically incorrect, but here goes: The underlying premise of Christianity is NOT equality. It is salvation through Jesus. Period.

***

God gives to us according to what we can handle. He knows our hearts and our intentions… more will be given to those who use well what they are given.

Now, are liberals really socialists? My opinion is yes. You can call it redistribution, expanding social programs, taking care of the poor, whatever you want, the principles are the same: take money from the wealthy (via taxation in this case) and spread it to those who don’t have as much via social programs. Robin Hood style. I’m going to leave that alone. Work through it. Think about it. Discuss amongst yourselves.

Taking that to the next level, what should the government’s role be, then? Biblically first, and then Constitutionally, what should America’s government look like? I can’t possibly do that justice. My advice would be to read the Bible and work toward understanding truth, and then take a look at the Constitution and understand the foundation of our laws. However, here’s my take on things.

Romans 13:1-7:

Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. 4 For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil. Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’ sake. For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are God’s ministers attending continually to this very thing. Render therefore to all their due: taxes to whom taxes are due, customs to whom customs, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor.

That’s self explanitory, and should be the foundation for our response to government. We are to follow the laws – regardless of who sets them. Judges (17:6, 21:25) makes it pretty clear that any form of government is better than chaos. Even a liberal one.

I also want to be clear that the Bible doesn’t dictate a particular form of government. However, in America, we are set up as a representative democracy, and as Christians who live in this country, we are to submit.

Now, in the Constitution we are given a very sparse outline of government. I don’t think that’s an accident. I believe that the government is there to protect us from each other and keep us from chaos, but they need to stay small. Focus on things like defense. When the government gets its hands on too many things, there will be problems. There is too much subjectivity involved, which is why separation of church and state is in place. Where is the line? How far is too far for the government? I think that line has already been crossed.

So far we have given the government power over our education, our businesses, our health care, and just about every other aspect of our lives – and that scope of power is growing rapidly. The social programs that are in place in our country remove responsibility from the individual. Get pregnant? It’s okay, even if you’re 15 you can go to a clinic and get an abortion – you don’t even have to tell mommy and daddy. Can’t get a job, or just don’t want to work? It’s okay. Welfare and foodstamps and Section 8 have you covered. Screw up and get fired? Unemployment’s got your back.

While I think select programs are good in moderation, it’s this thinking has given birth to the bailoutpalooza we’ve been watching. You’re working in a struggling industry with a union that puts your industry at a ridiculous handicap in foreign markets, and can’t figure out how to make it work? It’s okay, you’ll still get a $25 billion check to put off your inevitable failure a few more years. Our society has become so lazy, entitled and irresponsible that we’re destroying ourselves at a ridiculoulsly fast rate. People have GOT to be accountable. This goes for individuals AND industries, and covers both fiscal and social aspects of government.

Quick Wrap-Up:

Fiscally: The government HAS TO STOP FUNDING EVERYTHING THEY’RE FUNDING. They’ve already effectively bankrupted themselves, and raising taxes will do nothing but throw us deeper into the pit of recession. Programs have to be cut. Taxes have to be cut so people can afford to put money back in to the economy. Socially: It helps no one to remove accountability. At all. The laziness, entitlement, and moral decay that results is sickening.

The bottom line is this: Leave us alone.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxhYampIl7A]