Tag Archives: Sarah Palin

Jesus for President?

I have wrestled a lot with the role of Christianity in politics. What exactly does “separation of church and state” look like? Because I certainly have a different view than some in that regard. As a Christian, I believe that God has His hand in everything. I don’t believe he threw us down on earth and said “hey, figure it out!”. He said that we were to obey the government that he would set up for us.

So what does that look like in an increasingly secular America? I don’t know that anyone would make the claim that we are a Christian nation anymore. We are most definitely not a theocracy. I do not believe the answer to this is electing officials who will try to serve as spiritual leaders.

The widespread attitude towards Christians in government is that we are all right wing nut jobs. Anyone who is open about their faith in Jesus is a lunatic who wants to force religion down the throats of the entire country. Sarah Palin was a prime example – she was shredded for her faith, even though I feel like she did a good job of separating it from her politics. In this current political climate, it is entirely to our detriment to force a Christian “agenda”. It will do much more harm than good.

That said, I also think that Christians should be active in leading our country. It is critical that we have Godly men and women in office – people praying for our government from the inside and providing guidance. The difference between an official who forces “Christian” laws into action an official who prays and makes decisions in response to God is critical. There is no question that the latter would be more effective, as well as much more credible as a national candidate.

So, those are my thoughts. I will do what I can to support qualified, intelligent, prayerful Christians in government. I do not, however, want my officials to double as my pastor. I’ve said before, the government does NOT need to compete with my God. They will always lose.

Through The Eyes Of A Liberal: GOP Change

So someone tweeted this post yesterday, and if I could remember who it was I’d give credit. Just a heads up: language warning. Lots of it is liberal hate speech but I want to touch on a few things, since I think what he’s saying about GOP is pretty much in line with the rest of the left. I’m censoring what I quote.

Global Warming is Real – Even if you don’t believe it, the rest of the world does. That means you have to accept the reality of the situation and adjust accordingly. Suddenly it is cool to be eco-friendly and you guys are still the party that wants to drill in ANWAR. Even if you take the approach of “we don’t necessarily believe in it, but we are going to scale back efforts to <mess> up our environment just in case” that would be leaps and bounds ahead of your current strategy.

No and no. I’m all for taking care of the environment. Yeah, we make a mess of things and should clean it up. I do know that energy independence is critical, and I support drilling wherever there is oil. Our relations with the Middle East and Latin America depend on it. And if we are a nation that values the rights of polar bears over those of unborn children, we have way bigger things to deal with.

Education is Cool – Nominating Sarah Palin told the world that the GOP endorses stupidity. Cut. That. <junk>. Out. Even if you manage to elect a candidate that is obviously a moron, the truth will eventually come out. Didn’t we just go through this with 8 years of Bush? Hasn’t he effectively shown that electing unqualified people isn’t a good idea?

First of all, you’d be hard pressed to find a conservative who still supports Bush. Yes, I acknowledge that the GOP is not conservative anymore. Even so, I’d be willing to wager that most of the GOP faithful aren’t behind him either. Second, are we really still playing the Palin is stupid card? That seems to be the best course of action for the left when they can’t find anything else to shred her for. Did anyone listen to Biden throughout the campaign? Not only did he make FAR more detrimental gaffes, he has 36 years in the Senate behind him… shouldn’t he know better? Palin was an unbelievably quick study.

We want to talk about unqualified? I hate even validating this statement with a response, so I’ll keep it brief. No one has been able to show me one thing that Obama accomplished. Palin has done exceptionally well in her current office. Running a state requires a whole lot more intelligence than voting “present”. If we’re being completely honest, this whole conversation is irrelevant since Palin was running for VP and Obama’s campaign was for POTUS.

Stop Fighting Evolution – This is a hopeless battle that, in the long run, you won’t win. In fact, fighting this is just drawing resources away from more important issues. You need to tell you constituents that if they really believing in Intelligent Design, then they should teach it to their kids at home. End of story, move on.

I think part of this is true – it IS drawing resources away from more pressing issues. However, the ending statement completely lost me. Intelligent Design is a viable alternative to evolution and should be taught as such. Saying it should be taught at home when you fight so hard for public sex education, however,  is a logic fail. Personally, I think THAT is what should be taught at home. I’d much rather teach my kid what they need to know about sex and let a teacher handle the theory of evolution. What kind of parent gets offended by the Intelligent Design teaching, but allows their kid to learn about sex from a stranger?

The Internet is Important – If you looked at the top 20% of Internet movers & shakers you would find that they are virtually all Democrats. And why are they Democrats? Because the Republicans have done their best to let the Telecoms, the RIAA and the MPAA run the Internet as they see fit. The DMCA is perhaps the best example of how conservatives don’t get it. You are doing your best to alienate a key group of young, intelligent, industrious innovators.  Brush them off at your own peril. (incidentally, if you think I’m blowing this out of proportion look at Obama’s grassroots movement on the web and then look at McCain’s. Nuff said)

This point is one that we should take to heart. We absolutely dropped the ball on the internet campaign. 100%. I’m glad to see the movement on here now, and we need to keep the ball rolling forward. Groups like Smart Girl Politics, The New Republican, The Next Right, #dontgo, and #TCOT are moving us in the right direction. We need to keep that momentum going.

But by far the craziest has to be the notion that in order to fix the party the GOP has to become more conservative. Ok stop, you’re doing it wrong. You aren’t going to win anymore Presidential elections by campaigning harder in the South.

***

After all, Obama (if you haven’t noticed) is a centrist. And he will no doubt pull the Democratic party more into the mainstream. So what core issue will Republicans run on? Defending the country from terrorism? Good luck with that. Gay marriage is from the devil? Not enough people will care. Fiscal responsibility? Ha ha ha ha ha.

Wow. Could this be any more inaccurate? If we move any further to the left we will be to the left of a lot of Democrats. Conservatives are everywhere, and if Obama does 1/4 of what he says he’ll do, our country will implode and conservatives will be the ones rebuilding it.

Obama is a CENTRIST? His abortion stance is enough to remove that one. Take in to account his blatant redistribution push, his health care stance, and his plan to slash military spending, he is anything BUT a centrist. That just makes my head hurt. If you’re so far to the left that you think Obama is a centrist there may be no hope for you.

The end question, however is a good one. What DO we stand for? In my eyes, that should be small government, accountability for individuals and businesses, and minimal government spending. If we can’t lock down these basic principles, there really is no difference between us and the democrats, and we will be absorbed.

Huck V. Palin?

I don’t even understand why there is this Mike Huckabee v Sarah Palin conversation. Does anyone really think that Mike Huckabee will ever be POTUS? He whines, he slams his opponents, and has nothing unique to offer. Nothing about him is graceful or presidential. His greatest “strength” to conservatives is that he’s socially conservative – which is SO not going to win him any elections. Yes, I am a social conservative. However, I know that when it comes down to it, we are not accountable to the government or society or anyone but God, and what my country chooses will not affect what my personal choices are. I will choose what I feel is Biblical, regardless. I think social cons let that trump fiscally conservative principles, which is just as important in a government. 

I am sick of Huckabee. I wish he’d go away. Why does he even think he’s got a shot? I am going to be up front – I don’t think Palin should run in 2012. But if she chose to, she’d knock Huck out in a second, simply because she’s got the social conservative vote with the benefit of her energy experience, novelty, and the simple fact that she’s unbelievably charismatic. Not to mention that the most vocal conservatives in the country (Limbaugh, Ingraham, etc) are all Palin supporters. Their power alone would give Palin the edge. 

Sorry, Huck supporters. I just don’t get it.

Oh, Oprah. No One Cares.

So let’s talk about this Oprah v Palin situation. Do I care? Absolutely not. Does Oprah have an obligation to report fairly? No. She isn’t a journalist. She’s a talk show host. She made no qualms about her support for Obama. Was her support based on race? Probably. It doesn’t matter.

Oprah chose her candidate. Since she’s the almighty Oprah, she chose to use her influence to support him. Palin isn’t stupid, she knew that, and she made wise choices like Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric instead. What’s done is done. Oprah, Palin owes you nothing.

The news did however remind me of how much I dislike Oprah. I’m pretty sure that she is the most dangerous person in the media, primarily BECAUSE of her influence and how she uses it. That, however, is an entirely different post.

This is Way Bigger Than Palin, Ya'll…

So I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the direction I want to take my work, with SGP, this blog, and in my volunteer time. And originally, Palin was a large part of the reason I was excited about politics. However, her novelty has worn off for me. I do still like her and I will still support her when I can. That said, I do see some issues with her as a national candidate.

The biggest one is not a political one, in my eyes – it’s a cultural one. Our country is still a center right country. What that means is that, despite what the lefties and the media would  have you believe, the majority of Americans, at their core, hold on to their traditional values. Nothing spelled this out more clearly than deep blue California passing Prop 8.

Now – Palin. Yes, her politics are the most conservative we’ve seen in a candidate in a long time (minus the gray area of her amnesty position). I think she’s smart, and I think she’s capable. NO one has stirred people up like she has, and that is not a power that should be overlooked. She is definitely an asset to the GOP, if they ever figure out how to use her gifts.

However, Palin herself ends up contradicting her own conservative values, solely because of who she is as a Christian wife, mother, and woman. I think the fact that she was the superior to her husband in pretty much every (education, status, provider, etc…) way didn’t sit well with a lot of people. As unfair and horrible as the media was to her, I don’t believe that they were completely out of line in wondering how she would juggle raising five children, including an infant, (which any mother will tell you is a full time job in and of itself) with, say, possibly being the Commander in Chief of the most powerful military in the world during war time. Something has to give – and her children would be the ones to suffer for it.

Let me clear something up for you. I’m pretty much the opposite of a feminist in a lot of ways.

Palin won conservatives over because of her stance on government reform, tax cuts, gun control, THEN the social con issues. A large portion of the country won’t listen to the first three, and that’s where the divide happens. I recently talked to some girls about the abortion issue, and how that’s where we end up losing a lot of the women voters. We can’t bank on her winning the indie and moderate vote based on their inner social conservative.

Now, I am in no way denying the Palin effect, or contesting her capability or intelligence. Obviously, I voted for her, and I think that her support system (IE Todd) was great, and that her family was solid. I am just pointing out the things I see as faults, and saying that the scope of the conservative movement is so much bigger than Palin. There are so many other things for us to focus on. If we focus all of our energy on Palin, we’re setting ourselves up for failure in both 2010 and 2012.

Russian Idiot: … and we can have Alaska back!

So the economy is clearly falling apart. Igor Panarin, Russian analyst, claims that the financial pressures are enough to fracture the country into 6 separate parts, like so:

He predicted that the U.S. will break up into six parts - the Pacific coast, with its growing Chinese population; the South, with its Hispanics; Texas, where independence movements are on the rise; the Atlantic coast, with its distinct and separate mentality; five of the poorer central states with their large Native American populations; and the northern states, where the influence from Canada is strong.

Anyone else think this could be sort of fun? I mean, really, we could go to California and call it “traveling abroad”… is it really that much of a stretch?

Here’s my favorite part:

He even suggested that "we could claim Alaska - it was only granted on lease, after all."

Who would love to see us duke it out with Putin for Alaska? I can just see Palin and Putin going at it.

Putin: Um, so your lease is up. Imma need you to vacate the premises by the end of the month. And you totally blew your cleaning deposit with that drilling for oil bit.

*sigh* Comedy gold, my friends. I kinda hope this happens… Where would you all go? I’m headed to Texas… I’m not such a fan of being lumped in with the rest of the Atlantic coast.

A Plea to Huckabee: Shut up. Right now.

So I haven’t read it (and I have no intention of doing so), but from what I have read, Huckabee decided he hadn’t done enough whining so far, and that he needed to publish a book to settle the rest of his scores with Romney and Thompson. He whines about Romney not calling him after Iowa. He blasts Thompson, and criticizes his strategies.

Also taking on McCain’s VP choice, he rolled out one of the funniest quotes yet:

“I was scratching my head, saying, ‘Hey, wait a minute. She’s wonderful, but the only difference was she looks better in stilettos than I do, and she has better hair.’ It wasn’t so much a gender issue, but it was like they suddenly decided that everything they disliked about me was O.K. . . . She was given a pass by some of the very people who said I wasn’t prepared.”

Note to Huck: You lost. You will not win in 2012. No one wants you. And please don’t ever give me another image of you in stilettos and a Palin wig.

What I Learned From The Media…

Here are some post-election polls that DO matter… if only because they bring light to the ignorance surrounding this election.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8]

Clearly, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are non-factors to people. And Palin was the fall back for any stupid comment that was made – including Obama’s 57 states comment, Biden’s plagiarism, etc.

These weren’t fools that Howard Stern grabbed off the street, who may or may not have been voting (although, the results were pretty similar). Had the media done it’s job, this race would have been much more interesting to watch. Here’s the Stern audio, and a segment from Anna’s fabulous entry in response to it:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU]

I’m uncomfortable with voters choosing a “brand” instead of choosing policy that actually lines up with what they think. In the following clip, reporters with the Howard Stern show ask Obama supporters why they choose him over McCain, substituting McCain’s policies (pro-life, staying in Iraq until “victory” is reached) for Obama’s. The supporters agree specifically with McCain policy when it’s presented as belonging to Obama. This is NOT OK.

Now, yes, the election is over. At this point, how he got there is irrelevant. However, if the media continues to bury truth, which we have every reason to believe it will, Obama has eliminated any accountability with the people of the United States. Not only does he have a near-filibuster proof (filibuster proof if you count his new friend McCain, as well as a few other RINOs…) Senate, the House, and 3 supreme court appointments to make, he has the entire US media cleaning up after him and spinning until the people reporting the truth don’t even know what it is anymore.

The job of the media is supposed to be unbiased reporting of the news – the good, the bad and the ugly. However, during the epic media breakdown that was this election, few would argue that they were “fair and balanced”. These videos show us that the average American gets their news from mainstream media and doesn’t do the research. Is it possible to make the best decision based on false or partial knowledge? No. Let’s check out the Zogby polls, just to illustrate:

512 Obama Voters 11/13/08-11/15/08 MOE +/- 4.4 points

97.1% High School Graduate or higher, 55% College Graduates

Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)

81.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)

82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)

88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)

56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).

And yet…..

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes

Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter

And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her “house,” even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.

Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we “gave” one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)

97% high school grads, and more than half had completed college. These were not Stern’s streets of Harlem examples. Can we blame them? Naturally I want to say yes! Yes! Read! Learn! But, is it really a horrible thing to believe that the media is doing their job? I mean, most people don’t have the time to spend hours a day researching and analyzing things people say and watch speeches. Media, do your job. Meanwhile, bloggers, speak truth. Hopefully our voices will be heard.

MS-NBC: Even though the source was fake, we're not retracting our story…

So MS-NBC finally owned up to getting the Palin smears from a fake source. They were contacted by a man claiming to be Martin Eisenstadt, the McCain policy adviser who leaked the FOX News story about Palin not knowing Africa was a continent.  The Times elaborates.

Trouble is, Martin Eisenstadt doesn’t exist. His blog does, but it’s a put-on. The think tank where he is a senior fellow — the Harding Institute for Freedom and Democracy — is just a Web site. The TV clips of him on YouTube are fakes.

The kicker? They’re not “questioning the veracity of the report”.

The hoax was limited to the identity of the source in the story about Palin — not the FOX News story itself. While Palin has denied that she mistook Africa for a country, the veracity of that report was not put in question by the revelation that Eisenstadt is a phony.

So a fake person calls and gives you a story, and then you find out that they don’t actually exist… but you’re still buying the story? Please tell me I’m misunderstanding this.

Jindal: You Can't Win An Election By Criticizing The Other Side

Jindal had an MS-NBC interview to talk about the future of the GOP, as well as the republican governors conference that has gotten so much attention due to the attendance of Palin. Here’s the clip:

[vodpod id=ExternalVideo.744330&w=425&h=350&fv=]

His three bullet points on what we have to do to win elections:

1. Actions have to match rhetoric

2. Root out corruption

3. Be the “party of solutions”

“You can be a traditionalist and a reformer”.

I think you have to be a reformer in order to be a traditionalist at this point. The one thing both sides agreed on this entire election was that big changes need to me made in Washington – the divide came in that no one agreed on which changes should be made. Governor Jindal impresses me more every time I watch him. If Obama has even a mediocre presidency, I don’t think the GOP has a shot in 2012. I’d hate to see Jindal or Palin run against a historic incumbant who has even a moderate approval rating. The inevitable loss could irreversibly taint any future either one of them has nationally. This situation would require a sacraficial lamb on behalf of the GOP for 2012… someone past their prime, possibly? Any ideas? Guiliani? Romney?